Deep Learning-Based Positioning With Multi-Task Learning and Uncertainty-Based Fusion
Deep learning (DL) methods have been shown to improve the performance of several use cases for the fifth-generation (5G) New radio (NR) air interface. In this paper we investigate user equipment (UE) positioning using the channel state information (CSI) fingerprints between a UE and multiple base st...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10632202/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Deep learning (DL) methods have been shown to improve the performance of several use cases for the fifth-generation (5G) New radio (NR) air interface. In this paper we investigate user equipment (UE) positioning using the channel state information (CSI) fingerprints between a UE and multiple base stations (BSs). In such a setup, we consider two different fusion techniques: early and late fusion. With early fusion, a single DL model can be trained for UE positioning by combining the CSI fingerprints of the multiple BSs as input. With late fusion, a separate DL model is trained at each BS using the CSI specific to that BS and the outputs of these individual models are then combined to determine the UE’s position. In this work we compare these different fusion techniques and show that fusing the outputs of separate models achieves higher positioning accuracy, especially in a dynamic scenario. We also show that the combination of multiple outputs further benefits from considering the uncertainty of the output of the DL model at each BS. For a more efficient training of the DL model across BSs, we additionally propose a multi-task learning (MTL) scheme by sharing some parameters across the models while jointly training all models. This method, not only improves the accuracy of the individual models, but also of the final combined estimate. Lastly, we evaluate the reliability of the uncertainty estimation to determine which of the fusion methods provides the highest quality of uncertainty estimates. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2831-316X |