Assessment for Brazilian Children’s Physical Literacy tools: content validity, feasibility, and reliability

Physical literacy is a phenomenon that has the potential to improve our engagement in an active life. However, there are no appropriate and validated instruments for the Brazilian context. This study aimed to present the Assessment for Brazilian Children’s Physical Literacy tools and evaluate their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anderson Henry Pereira Feitoza, Ariane Brito Diniz Santos, Paulo Cesar Wauthier Soares, Albert Lucas Olinto Tertuliano, Suedem Andrade Milani, Cleverton Jose Farias de Souza, Alessandro Hervaldo Nicolai Ré, Maria Teresa Cattuzzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Desafio Singular 2025-08-01
Series:Motricidade
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/33856
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Physical literacy is a phenomenon that has the potential to improve our engagement in an active life. However, there are no appropriate and validated instruments for the Brazilian context. This study aimed to present the Assessment for Brazilian Children’s Physical Literacy tools and evaluate their content validity, reliability, and feasibility. Five instruments — the Perception of Motor Competence Scale and Confidence Scale for Involvement in Physical Activity (affective domain), the Sedentary Behavior Scale and Organized Physical Activity Questionnaire (behavioral domain), and the Scale of Knowledge and Understanding of Physical Activity (comprehension domain) — were tested for content validity with a panel of 19 judges (Delphi method). The Content Validity Coefficient (> .8) confirmed the validity for all instruments; subsequently, schoolchildren aged 8 to 13 years (n = 19) answered the instruments. Correlations confirmed the tools’ reliability (good to excellent); feasibility results ranged from good to excellent. These Assessment for Brazilian Children’s Physical Literacy tools proved to be valid, reliable, and feasible for this Brazilian sample.
ISSN:1646-107X
2182-2972