Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study

This paper presents an approach of identifying prosthetic knee movements through pattern recognition of mechanical responses at the internal socket’s wall. A quadrilateral double socket was custom made and instrumented with two force sensing resistors (FSR) attached to specific anterior and posterio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amr M. El-Sayed, Nur Azah Hamzaid, Kenneth Y. S. Tan, Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/923286
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558272545030144
author Amr M. El-Sayed
Nur Azah Hamzaid
Kenneth Y. S. Tan
Noor Azuan Abu Osman
author_facet Amr M. El-Sayed
Nur Azah Hamzaid
Kenneth Y. S. Tan
Noor Azuan Abu Osman
author_sort Amr M. El-Sayed
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents an approach of identifying prosthetic knee movements through pattern recognition of mechanical responses at the internal socket’s wall. A quadrilateral double socket was custom made and instrumented with two force sensing resistors (FSR) attached to specific anterior and posterior sites of the socket’s wall. A second setup was established by attaching three piezoelectric sensors at the anterior distal, anterior proximal, and posterior sites. Gait cycle and locomotion movements such as stair ascent and sit to stand were adopted to characterize the validity of the technique. FSR and piezoelectric outputs were measured with reference to the knee angle during each phase. Piezoelectric sensors could identify the movement of midswing and terminal swing, pre-full standing, pull-up at gait, sit to stand, and stair ascent. In contrast, FSR could estimate the gait cycle stance and swing phases and identify the pre-full standing at sit to stand. FSR showed less variation during sit to stand and stair ascent to sensitively represent the different movement states. The study highlighted the capacity of using in-socket sensors for knee movement identification. In addition, it validated the efficacy of the system and warrants further investigation with more amputee subjects and different sockets types.
format Article
id doaj-art-c42259457e9843e49abd14f16af8d7aa
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-c42259457e9843e49abd14f16af8d7aa2025-02-03T01:32:49ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/923286923286Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility StudyAmr M. El-Sayed0Nur Azah Hamzaid1Kenneth Y. S. Tan2Noor Azuan Abu Osman3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaThis paper presents an approach of identifying prosthetic knee movements through pattern recognition of mechanical responses at the internal socket’s wall. A quadrilateral double socket was custom made and instrumented with two force sensing resistors (FSR) attached to specific anterior and posterior sites of the socket’s wall. A second setup was established by attaching three piezoelectric sensors at the anterior distal, anterior proximal, and posterior sites. Gait cycle and locomotion movements such as stair ascent and sit to stand were adopted to characterize the validity of the technique. FSR and piezoelectric outputs were measured with reference to the knee angle during each phase. Piezoelectric sensors could identify the movement of midswing and terminal swing, pre-full standing, pull-up at gait, sit to stand, and stair ascent. In contrast, FSR could estimate the gait cycle stance and swing phases and identify the pre-full standing at sit to stand. FSR showed less variation during sit to stand and stair ascent to sensitively represent the different movement states. The study highlighted the capacity of using in-socket sensors for knee movement identification. In addition, it validated the efficacy of the system and warrants further investigation with more amputee subjects and different sockets types.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/923286
spellingShingle Amr M. El-Sayed
Nur Azah Hamzaid
Kenneth Y. S. Tan
Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
The Scientific World Journal
title Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_full Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_short Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_sort detection of prosthetic knee movement phases via in socket sensors a feasibility study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/923286
work_keys_str_mv AT amrmelsayed detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy
AT nurazahhamzaid detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy
AT kennethystan detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy
AT noorazuanabuosman detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy