Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy

The role of smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes for tobacco harm reduction remains controversial. This study was conducted to understand the perspectives of a panel of Italian experts on this topic. Using Delphi consensus methodology, expert opinions on the use of smoke-free alternatives, tobacco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pasquale Caponnetto, Vincenzo Contursi, Francesco Fedele, Fabio Lugoboni, Salvatore Novo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1349265/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576070423937024
author Pasquale Caponnetto
Pasquale Caponnetto
Vincenzo Contursi
Francesco Fedele
Fabio Lugoboni
Salvatore Novo
author_facet Pasquale Caponnetto
Pasquale Caponnetto
Vincenzo Contursi
Francesco Fedele
Fabio Lugoboni
Salvatore Novo
author_sort Pasquale Caponnetto
collection DOAJ
description The role of smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes for tobacco harm reduction remains controversial. This study was conducted to understand the perspectives of a panel of Italian experts on this topic. Using Delphi consensus methodology, expert opinions on the use of smoke-free alternatives, tobacco harm reduction and anti-smoking legislation were gathered and analyzed. In July 2022, a Scientific Committee, including five members, proposed 38 statements spanning three areas: (1) harm from tobacco smoking and strategies for harm reduction; (2) smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes; and (3) anti-smoking legislation. Between August and November 2022, the Expert Panel, including members of the Scientific Committee and 15 other key opinion leaders, voted on the statements in two rounds. Consensus was achieved on 24 of 38 statements. The results emphasized the persistent national health threat posed by tobacco smoking in Italy, with a smoking prevalence of 20–24% between 2007 and 2022. Emphasizing harm reduction as a pivotal public healthcare strategy, the Expert Panel agreed on 10 statements related to smoke-free alternatives, but underlined the need for further research despite promising initial findings. The Expert Panel also reached consensus on six statements regarding anti-smoking legislation, stressing the importance of crafting and upholding rigorous anti-smoking laws that are consistent with World Health Organization guidelines. This pioneering Delphi consensus statement illuminates the complicated debate regarding the role of smoke-free alternatives for tobacco harm reduction in Italy. The findings highlight the evolving nature and advocate the need for ongoing discussions and further research on this important issue.
format Article
id doaj-art-c332908ef1b74ed78c4469aad42116db
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-0640
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj-art-c332908ef1b74ed78c4469aad42116db2025-01-31T12:26:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402025-01-011610.3389/fpsyt.2025.13492651349265Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in ItalyPasquale Caponnetto0Pasquale Caponnetto1Vincenzo Contursi2Francesco Fedele3Fabio Lugoboni4Salvatore Novo5Department of Educational Sciences, Section of Psychology, University of Catania, Catania, ItalyCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Catania, ItalyCardiovascular Area, Italian Interdisciplinary Society for Primary Care, Bari, ItalyDepartment of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological and Geriatric Sciences, Istituto Nazionale per le Ricerche Cardiovascolari (INRC), Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, ItalyDepartment PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, ItalyThe role of smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes for tobacco harm reduction remains controversial. This study was conducted to understand the perspectives of a panel of Italian experts on this topic. Using Delphi consensus methodology, expert opinions on the use of smoke-free alternatives, tobacco harm reduction and anti-smoking legislation were gathered and analyzed. In July 2022, a Scientific Committee, including five members, proposed 38 statements spanning three areas: (1) harm from tobacco smoking and strategies for harm reduction; (2) smoke-free alternatives to cigarettes; and (3) anti-smoking legislation. Between August and November 2022, the Expert Panel, including members of the Scientific Committee and 15 other key opinion leaders, voted on the statements in two rounds. Consensus was achieved on 24 of 38 statements. The results emphasized the persistent national health threat posed by tobacco smoking in Italy, with a smoking prevalence of 20–24% between 2007 and 2022. Emphasizing harm reduction as a pivotal public healthcare strategy, the Expert Panel agreed on 10 statements related to smoke-free alternatives, but underlined the need for further research despite promising initial findings. The Expert Panel also reached consensus on six statements regarding anti-smoking legislation, stressing the importance of crafting and upholding rigorous anti-smoking laws that are consistent with World Health Organization guidelines. This pioneering Delphi consensus statement illuminates the complicated debate regarding the role of smoke-free alternatives for tobacco harm reduction in Italy. The findings highlight the evolving nature and advocate the need for ongoing discussions and further research on this important issue.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1349265/fullDelphi consensuselectronic cigarettesheated tobacco productsItalypublic healthsmoke-free products
spellingShingle Pasquale Caponnetto
Pasquale Caponnetto
Vincenzo Contursi
Francesco Fedele
Fabio Lugoboni
Salvatore Novo
Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Delphi consensus
electronic cigarettes
heated tobacco products
Italy
public health
smoke-free products
title Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy
title_full Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy
title_fullStr Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy
title_short Delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention, cessation and harm reduction in Italy
title_sort delphi consensus methodology to gauge expert perspectives on smoking prevention cessation and harm reduction in italy
topic Delphi consensus
electronic cigarettes
heated tobacco products
Italy
public health
smoke-free products
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1349265/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pasqualecaponnetto delphiconsensusmethodologytogaugeexpertperspectivesonsmokingpreventioncessationandharmreductioninitaly
AT pasqualecaponnetto delphiconsensusmethodologytogaugeexpertperspectivesonsmokingpreventioncessationandharmreductioninitaly
AT vincenzocontursi delphiconsensusmethodologytogaugeexpertperspectivesonsmokingpreventioncessationandharmreductioninitaly
AT francescofedele delphiconsensusmethodologytogaugeexpertperspectivesonsmokingpreventioncessationandharmreductioninitaly
AT fabiolugoboni delphiconsensusmethodologytogaugeexpertperspectivesonsmokingpreventioncessationandharmreductioninitaly
AT salvatorenovo delphiconsensusmethodologytogaugeexpertperspectivesonsmokingpreventioncessationandharmreductioninitaly