Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
This is the first Cochrane Corner in the International Journal of First Aid Education, provided by Cochrane First Aid. It summarizes the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that compares the effectiveness of continuous versus interrupted chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in...
Saved in:
Format: | Article |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
Aperio
2021-10-01
|
Series: | International Journal of First Aid Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://firstaidjournal.org/article/id/2324/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Case Support for Compression-Only CPR: St. John Ambulance
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Considerations in Using Videoconferencing to Assess Multi-learner Classes of Layperson CPR: A Benchmark Study
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Psychological Conflicts in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-HospitalCardiac-Arrest
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Effect of Instituting Upper Limits for Chest Compression Depth for Laypersons at Six-months After Chest Compression-Only Training: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study
Published: (2020-12-01) -
A Comparison of CPR on a Hard Surface Compared to CPR on a Mattress
by: Kara Stout, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)