Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?

This is the first Cochrane Corner in the International Journal of First Aid Education, provided by Cochrane First Aid. It summarizes the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that compares the effectiveness of continuous versus interrupted chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aperio 2021-10-01
Series:International Journal of First Aid Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://firstaidjournal.org/article/id/2324/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575936168460288
collection DOAJ
description This is the first Cochrane Corner in the International Journal of First Aid Education, provided by Cochrane First Aid. It summarizes the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that compares the effectiveness of continuous versus interrupted chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in case of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The review was developed by the Cochrane Emergency and Critical Care Group and is published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 3, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD0010134 (see www.cochranelibrary.com for information).
format Article
id doaj-art-c2c31b0878684910879b1d60f4da69d5
institution Kabale University
issn 2514-7153
language English
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Aperio
record_format Article
series International Journal of First Aid Education
spelling doaj-art-c2c31b0878684910879b1d60f4da69d52025-01-31T16:33:08ZengAperioInternational Journal of First Aid Education2514-71532021-10-014110.25894/ijfae.4.1.6Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?This is the first Cochrane Corner in the International Journal of First Aid Education, provided by Cochrane First Aid. It summarizes the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that compares the effectiveness of continuous versus interrupted chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in case of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The review was developed by the Cochrane Emergency and Critical Care Group and is published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 3, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD0010134 (see www.cochranelibrary.com for information).https://firstaidjournal.org/article/id/2324/CPRLaypersonout-of-hospitalcardiac arrestcontinuous chest compressionsCP, Bystander CPR
spellingShingle Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
International Journal of First Aid Education
CPR
Layperson
out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest
continuous chest compressions
CP, Bystander CPR
title Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
title_full Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
title_fullStr Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
title_full_unstemmed Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
title_short Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
title_sort is continuous chest compression cpr by untrained bystanders more effective than conventional cpr with rescue breathing
topic CPR
Layperson
out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest
continuous chest compressions
CP, Bystander CPR
url https://firstaidjournal.org/article/id/2324/