Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems

The purpose of this review is to comprehensively compare the developments and challenges in the energy performance of unconventional pneumatic suspension (PS) and hydropneumatic suspension (HPS), which have special applications in passenger cars, trucks, military vehicles and agricultural equipment....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryszard Dindorf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/427
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588579125067776
author Ryszard Dindorf
author_facet Ryszard Dindorf
author_sort Ryszard Dindorf
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this review is to comprehensively compare the developments and challenges in the energy performance of unconventional pneumatic suspension (PS) and hydropneumatic suspension (HPS), which have special applications in passenger cars, trucks, military vehicles and agricultural equipment. The main differences between PS and HPS, as well as their advantages and disadvantages, are presented. The PS system is discussed along with its principle of operation, advances in development, principle of operation of air springs, their models, characteristics, vibration isolation, and simulation models. The HPS system is discussed, along with its operational principles, progress in development, models, and characteristics. This review also discusses new trends in HPS development, such as the effect of a pressure fluctuation damper (PFD) placed in a hydraulic cylinder on the damping performance index (DPI) of an HPS under off-road driving conditions. It highlights innovative solutions that can be expected in the future in PS and HPS systems, with the expectations of drivers and passengers. The review focused on trends and challenges in PS and HPS development, such as integration with electronics, smart solutions, customized solutions, emphasis on compliance with ecological and environmental requirements, and applications in electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs).
format Article
id doaj-art-c23c19d018994dd7820f204c79a73c99
institution Kabale University
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj-art-c23c19d018994dd7820f204c79a73c992025-01-24T13:31:27ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732025-01-0118242710.3390/en18020427Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension SystemsRyszard Dindorf0Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, PolandThe purpose of this review is to comprehensively compare the developments and challenges in the energy performance of unconventional pneumatic suspension (PS) and hydropneumatic suspension (HPS), which have special applications in passenger cars, trucks, military vehicles and agricultural equipment. The main differences between PS and HPS, as well as their advantages and disadvantages, are presented. The PS system is discussed along with its principle of operation, advances in development, principle of operation of air springs, their models, characteristics, vibration isolation, and simulation models. The HPS system is discussed, along with its operational principles, progress in development, models, and characteristics. This review also discusses new trends in HPS development, such as the effect of a pressure fluctuation damper (PFD) placed in a hydraulic cylinder on the damping performance index (DPI) of an HPS under off-road driving conditions. It highlights innovative solutions that can be expected in the future in PS and HPS systems, with the expectations of drivers and passengers. The review focused on trends and challenges in PS and HPS development, such as integration with electronics, smart solutions, customized solutions, emphasis on compliance with ecological and environmental requirements, and applications in electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs).https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/427vehicle suspension systempneumatic suspension systemhydropneumatic suspension systemair springhydropneumatic accumulatorenergy performance
spellingShingle Ryszard Dindorf
Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems
Energies
vehicle suspension system
pneumatic suspension system
hydropneumatic suspension system
air spring
hydropneumatic accumulator
energy performance
title Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems
title_full Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems
title_fullStr Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems
title_short Comprehensive Review Comparing the Development and Challenges in the Energy Performance of Pneumatic and Hydropneumatic Suspension Systems
title_sort comprehensive review comparing the development and challenges in the energy performance of pneumatic and hydropneumatic suspension systems
topic vehicle suspension system
pneumatic suspension system
hydropneumatic suspension system
air spring
hydropneumatic accumulator
energy performance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/427
work_keys_str_mv AT ryszarddindorf comprehensivereviewcomparingthedevelopmentandchallengesintheenergyperformanceofpneumaticandhydropneumaticsuspensionsystems