Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert

Starting from the observation of the omnipresence of moments of sociability in Flaubert's work, even for the most solitary characters, this article questions the place of the group in the Flaubertian semiotic system. Although some configurations (religious ceremonies, meals, ball or theater eve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bernard Gendrel
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) 2023-06-01
Series:Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/4790
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095847181975552
author Bernard Gendrel
author_facet Bernard Gendrel
author_sort Bernard Gendrel
collection DOAJ
description Starting from the observation of the omnipresence of moments of sociability in Flaubert's work, even for the most solitary characters, this article questions the place of the group in the Flaubertian semiotic system. Although some configurations (religious ceremonies, meals, ball or theater evenings, political meetings, etc.) are already used by the literary tradition, the games of modifications, enrichments or displacements operated at the different levels of the “parcours génératif” allow very often, as Greimas put it, to “produce the unexpected with almost nothing”.
format Article
id doaj-art-c1bd3595a8d54b36b5d2ed0b0d387377
institution Kabale University
issn 1969-6191
language fra
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
record_format Article
series Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
spelling doaj-art-c1bd3595a8d54b36b5d2ed0b0d3873772025-02-05T16:29:28ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912023-06-012910.4000/flaubert.4790Sémiotique du groupe chez FlaubertBernard GendrelStarting from the observation of the omnipresence of moments of sociability in Flaubert's work, even for the most solitary characters, this article questions the place of the group in the Flaubertian semiotic system. Although some configurations (religious ceremonies, meals, ball or theater evenings, political meetings, etc.) are already used by the literary tradition, the games of modifications, enrichments or displacements operated at the different levels of the “parcours génératif” allow very often, as Greimas put it, to “produce the unexpected with almost nothing”.https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/4790sémiotiqueGreimasgroupeindividutopoï
spellingShingle Bernard Gendrel
Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert
Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
sémiotique
Greimas
groupe
individu
topoï
title Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert
title_full Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert
title_fullStr Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert
title_full_unstemmed Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert
title_short Sémiotique du groupe chez Flaubert
title_sort semiotique du groupe chez flaubert
topic sémiotique
Greimas
groupe
individu
topoï
url https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/4790
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardgendrel semiotiquedugroupechezflaubert