Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points

Objective: To explore outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery (ACLR) between individuals using private and public healthcare. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of participants, 9–36 months post-ACLR using public or private healthcare services. Multivariable li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas J. West, Andrea M. Bruder, Kay M. Crossley, Michael A. Girdwood, Laura K. To, Jamon L. Couch, Mark J. Scholes, Sebastian C.S. Evans, Melissa J. Haberfield, Christian J. Barton, Ewa M. Roos, Alysha De Livera, Adam G. Culvenor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:JSAMS Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269672500002X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087417567313920
author Thomas J. West
Andrea M. Bruder
Kay M. Crossley
Michael A. Girdwood
Laura K. To
Jamon L. Couch
Mark J. Scholes
Sebastian C.S. Evans
Melissa J. Haberfield
Christian J. Barton
Ewa M. Roos
Alysha De Livera
Adam G. Culvenor
author_facet Thomas J. West
Andrea M. Bruder
Kay M. Crossley
Michael A. Girdwood
Laura K. To
Jamon L. Couch
Mark J. Scholes
Sebastian C.S. Evans
Melissa J. Haberfield
Christian J. Barton
Ewa M. Roos
Alysha De Livera
Adam G. Culvenor
author_sort Thomas J. West
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To explore outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery (ACLR) between individuals using private and public healthcare. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of participants, 9–36 months post-ACLR using public or private healthcare services. Multivariable linear regression assessed the association between healthcare service used (private versus public) with self-reported outcomes (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales of pain, symptoms, sport/recreation, knee-related quality of life (QoL); 0–100 scale), adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 314 participants were included (median age 29 years, 35 ​% female). One hundred and thirty-nine (44 ​%) underwent ACLR using private healthcare. Individuals using private healthcare for ACLR reported better post-ACLR knee-related QoL (mean difference 5.1; 95%CI 0.6 to 9.7) than individuals using public healthcare, when adjusted for available confounders. No other KOOS subscale scores (pain, symptoms, sport/recreation) differed between healthcare groups in our adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Australian young adults who underwent ACLR using private healthcare (compared to public healthcare) services reported better knee-related QoL post-operatively in this cross-sectional cohort. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors contributed little to the differences observed. Future research should consider potential disparities in outcomes between participants using differing healthcare services both clinically and when recruiting participants into research studies evaluating outcomes post-ACLR.
format Article
id doaj-art-c1336e6724b34bd091500d7c02a186ed
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-6967
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSAMS Plus
spelling doaj-art-c1336e6724b34bd091500d7c02a186ed2025-02-06T05:13:06ZengElsevierJSAMS Plus2772-69672025-06-015100088Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey pointsThomas J. West0Andrea M. Bruder1Kay M. Crossley2Michael A. Girdwood3Laura K. To4Jamon L. Couch5Mark J. Scholes6Sebastian C.S. Evans7Melissa J. Haberfield8Christian J. Barton9Ewa M. Roos10Alysha De Livera11Adam G. Culvenor12La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Australia; Corresponding author. La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, CanadaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, AustraliaDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkMathematics and Statistics, School of Computing Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, AustraliaLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian IOC Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AustraliaObjective: To explore outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery (ACLR) between individuals using private and public healthcare. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of participants, 9–36 months post-ACLR using public or private healthcare services. Multivariable linear regression assessed the association between healthcare service used (private versus public) with self-reported outcomes (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales of pain, symptoms, sport/recreation, knee-related quality of life (QoL); 0–100 scale), adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 314 participants were included (median age 29 years, 35 ​% female). One hundred and thirty-nine (44 ​%) underwent ACLR using private healthcare. Individuals using private healthcare for ACLR reported better post-ACLR knee-related QoL (mean difference 5.1; 95%CI 0.6 to 9.7) than individuals using public healthcare, when adjusted for available confounders. No other KOOS subscale scores (pain, symptoms, sport/recreation) differed between healthcare groups in our adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Australian young adults who underwent ACLR using private healthcare (compared to public healthcare) services reported better knee-related QoL post-operatively in this cross-sectional cohort. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors contributed little to the differences observed. Future research should consider potential disparities in outcomes between participants using differing healthcare services both clinically and when recruiting participants into research studies evaluating outcomes post-ACLR.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269672500002XAnterior cruciate ligamentKneeReconstructionOsteoarthritisHealthcare
spellingShingle Thomas J. West
Andrea M. Bruder
Kay M. Crossley
Michael A. Girdwood
Laura K. To
Jamon L. Couch
Mark J. Scholes
Sebastian C.S. Evans
Melissa J. Haberfield
Christian J. Barton
Ewa M. Roos
Alysha De Livera
Adam G. Culvenor
Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points
JSAMS Plus
Anterior cruciate ligament
Knee
Reconstruction
Osteoarthritis
Healthcare
title Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points
title_full Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points
title_fullStr Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points
title_short Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in AustraliaKey points
title_sort outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery from private and public healthcare services in australiakey points
topic Anterior cruciate ligament
Knee
Reconstruction
Osteoarthritis
Healthcare
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277269672500002X
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasjwest outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT andreambruder outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT kaymcrossley outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT michaelagirdwood outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT laurakto outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT jamonlcouch outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT markjscholes outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT sebastiancsevans outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT melissajhaberfield outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT christianjbarton outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT ewamroos outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT alyshadelivera outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints
AT adamgculvenor outcomesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgeryfromprivateandpublichealthcareservicesinaustraliakeypoints