Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients

Background. Tooth-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) is one of the most reliable treatment options to replace missing teeth. The longevity of the treatment could, however, be affected by several general and local factors, especially bruxism. Objective. To investigate the influence of bruxism on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Hawthan, Bruno R. Chrcanovic, Christel Larsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6818170
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564912610607104
author Mohammed Hawthan
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Christel Larsson
author_facet Mohammed Hawthan
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Christel Larsson
author_sort Mohammed Hawthan
collection DOAJ
description Background. Tooth-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) is one of the most reliable treatment options to replace missing teeth. The longevity of the treatment could, however, be affected by several general and local factors, especially bruxism. Objective. To investigate the influence of bruxism on the long-term survival of tooth-supported FDPs in bruxers compared to a matched group of nonbruxers, taking several clinical variables into account. Materials and Methods. The present retrospective cohort study was based on records of patients treated with 3–7-unit tooth-supported FDPs with a minimum follow-up time of 6 months after prosthesis delivery. The criteria for the diagnosis of “possible” and “probable” sleep or awake bruxism were used. A matched group of nonbruxers was selected on the basis of similarities in four factors, patients’ gender and age, number of prosthetic units of the FDPs, and follow-up time. The paired-samples t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to compared mean values between the two groups. Contingency tables of categorical data were analyzed by McNemar’s test. Results. The cohort group consisted of 62 noncantilevered FDPs in each group, followed up for a mean of 110.1 and 106.5 months (bruxers and nonbruxers, respectively). Tooth-supported FDPs in bruxers presented significantly higher failure rate than in nonbruxers (32.3% vs. 25.8%, respectively; p=0.001). Loss of retention and tooth loss were the main reasons for failures in both groups. For nonsmokers, the FDP failure rate was higher in nonbruxers. Technical and biological complications were significantly more prevalent in bruxers compared to nonbruxers. Conclusions. Bruxism is suggested to increase technical and biological complications and FDP failure.
format Article
id doaj-art-c0b07dd3c6b143cc9b4a81af0679f942
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-c0b07dd3c6b143cc9b4a81af0679f9422025-02-03T01:09:51ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6818170Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer PatientsMohammed Hawthan0Bruno R. Chrcanovic1Christel Larsson2Department of ProsthodonticsDepartment of ProsthodonticsDepartment of ProsthodonticsBackground. Tooth-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) is one of the most reliable treatment options to replace missing teeth. The longevity of the treatment could, however, be affected by several general and local factors, especially bruxism. Objective. To investigate the influence of bruxism on the long-term survival of tooth-supported FDPs in bruxers compared to a matched group of nonbruxers, taking several clinical variables into account. Materials and Methods. The present retrospective cohort study was based on records of patients treated with 3–7-unit tooth-supported FDPs with a minimum follow-up time of 6 months after prosthesis delivery. The criteria for the diagnosis of “possible” and “probable” sleep or awake bruxism were used. A matched group of nonbruxers was selected on the basis of similarities in four factors, patients’ gender and age, number of prosthetic units of the FDPs, and follow-up time. The paired-samples t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to compared mean values between the two groups. Contingency tables of categorical data were analyzed by McNemar’s test. Results. The cohort group consisted of 62 noncantilevered FDPs in each group, followed up for a mean of 110.1 and 106.5 months (bruxers and nonbruxers, respectively). Tooth-supported FDPs in bruxers presented significantly higher failure rate than in nonbruxers (32.3% vs. 25.8%, respectively; p=0.001). Loss of retention and tooth loss were the main reasons for failures in both groups. For nonsmokers, the FDP failure rate was higher in nonbruxers. Technical and biological complications were significantly more prevalent in bruxers compared to nonbruxers. Conclusions. Bruxism is suggested to increase technical and biological complications and FDP failure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6818170
spellingShingle Mohammed Hawthan
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Christel Larsson
Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients
International Journal of Dentistry
title Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients
title_full Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients
title_fullStr Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients
title_short Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients
title_sort retrospective study comparing clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses in matched groups of bruxer and nonbruxer patients
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6818170
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedhawthan retrospectivestudycomparingclinicaloutcomesoffixeddentalprosthesesinmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatients
AT brunorchrcanovic retrospectivestudycomparingclinicaloutcomesoffixeddentalprosthesesinmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatients
AT christellarsson retrospectivestudycomparingclinicaloutcomesoffixeddentalprosthesesinmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatients