Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing

Background: The pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain (FAP) is unknown. The upright portion of a tilt table test triggers typical symptoms in certain children. Aim: To compare the pathophysiology and treatment response of children with FAP whose gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) were replicate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaista Safder, Thomas C. Chelimsky, Mary Ann O'Riordan, Gisela Chelimsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2009-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/868496
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547528509227008
author Shaista Safder
Thomas C. Chelimsky
Mary Ann O'Riordan
Gisela Chelimsky
author_facet Shaista Safder
Thomas C. Chelimsky
Mary Ann O'Riordan
Gisela Chelimsky
author_sort Shaista Safder
collection DOAJ
description Background: The pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain (FAP) is unknown. The upright portion of a tilt table test triggers typical symptoms in certain children. Aim: To compare the pathophysiology and treatment response of children with FAP whose gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) were replicated (RGI) by tilt table testing (TTT) to those in whom TTT did not have this effect (NRGI). Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review of the autonomic laboratory database identified all children tested for GI complaints. We compared results of TTT, Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing and the axon reflex sweat test. Overall treatment response and that specific to fludrocortisone was ranked from 1 to 5, with 1 “much worse,” 3 “neutral,” and 5 “much better.” Results: 32/76 identified children had reproducible symptoms on TTT (RGI) and 44 did not (NRGI). The RGI group was younger, had a shorter duration of symptoms, more postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and benefited more from fludrocortisone (73% in RGI vs. 25% in NRGI). Conclusion: Dividing patients with FAP according to the effect of TTT on their symptoms appears to delineate 2 fundamentally different groups, with potentially different pathophysiologies and treatment responses. A prospective study is needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-c0ab98813fbc4046856b8ba575fa53c3
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-c0ab98813fbc4046856b8ba575fa53c32025-02-03T06:44:26ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2009-01-01200910.1155/2009/868496868496Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table TestingShaista Safder0Thomas C. Chelimsky1Mary Ann O'Riordan2Gisela Chelimsky3Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children Hospital, Case medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Oh 44106, USADepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Oh 44106, USADepartment of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children Hospital, Case medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Oh 44106, USADepartment of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children Hospital, Case medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Oh 44106, USABackground: The pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain (FAP) is unknown. The upright portion of a tilt table test triggers typical symptoms in certain children. Aim: To compare the pathophysiology and treatment response of children with FAP whose gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) were replicated (RGI) by tilt table testing (TTT) to those in whom TTT did not have this effect (NRGI). Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review of the autonomic laboratory database identified all children tested for GI complaints. We compared results of TTT, Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing and the axon reflex sweat test. Overall treatment response and that specific to fludrocortisone was ranked from 1 to 5, with 1 “much worse,” 3 “neutral,” and 5 “much better.” Results: 32/76 identified children had reproducible symptoms on TTT (RGI) and 44 did not (NRGI). The RGI group was younger, had a shorter duration of symptoms, more postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and benefited more from fludrocortisone (73% in RGI vs. 25% in NRGI). Conclusion: Dividing patients with FAP according to the effect of TTT on their symptoms appears to delineate 2 fundamentally different groups, with potentially different pathophysiologies and treatment responses. A prospective study is needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/868496
spellingShingle Shaista Safder
Thomas C. Chelimsky
Mary Ann O'Riordan
Gisela Chelimsky
Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing
title_full Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing
title_fullStr Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing
title_full_unstemmed Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing
title_short Autonomic Testing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Implications of Reproducible Gastrointestinal Complaints during Tilt Table Testing
title_sort autonomic testing in functional gastrointestinal disorders implications of reproducible gastrointestinal complaints during tilt table testing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/868496
work_keys_str_mv AT shaistasafder autonomictestinginfunctionalgastrointestinaldisordersimplicationsofreproduciblegastrointestinalcomplaintsduringtilttabletesting
AT thomascchelimsky autonomictestinginfunctionalgastrointestinaldisordersimplicationsofreproduciblegastrointestinalcomplaintsduringtilttabletesting
AT maryannoriordan autonomictestinginfunctionalgastrointestinaldisordersimplicationsofreproduciblegastrointestinalcomplaintsduringtilttabletesting
AT giselachelimsky autonomictestinginfunctionalgastrointestinaldisordersimplicationsofreproduciblegastrointestinalcomplaintsduringtilttabletesting