Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems

Field studies were conducted from 2007 through 2009 to determine weed efficacy and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to herbicide systems that included ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated. Control of devil's claw (Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thellung), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. J. Grichar, P. A. Dotray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Agronomy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/597434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554859932418048
author W. J. Grichar
P. A. Dotray
author_facet W. J. Grichar
P. A. Dotray
author_sort W. J. Grichar
collection DOAJ
description Field studies were conducted from 2007 through 2009 to determine weed efficacy and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to herbicide systems that included ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated. Control of devil's claw (Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thellung), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), and puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris L.) was most consistent with ethalfluralin followed by either imazapic or imazethapyr applied postemergence. Peanut stunting was 19% when paraquat alone was applied early-postemergence. Stunting increased to greater than 30% when ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated was followed by S-metolachlor applied preemergence and paraquat applied early-postemergence. Stunting (7%) was also observed when ethalfluralin was followed by flumioxazin plus S-metolachlor applied preemergence with lactofen applied mid-postemergence. Ethalfluralin followed by paraquat applied early-postemergence reduced peanut yield when compared to the nontreated check. Ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated followed by imazapic applied mid-postemergence provided the greatest yield (6220 kg/ha). None of the herbicide treatments reduced peanut grade (sound mature kernels plus sound splits) when compared with the nontreated check.
format Article
id doaj-art-c05738b4f2c64979b033f427efb81224
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8159
1687-8167
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-c05738b4f2c64979b033f427efb812242025-02-03T05:50:20ZengWileyInternational Journal of Agronomy1687-81591687-81672012-01-01201210.1155/2012/597434597434Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide SystemsW. J. Grichar0P. A. Dotray1Texas AgriLife Research, 3507 Highway 59E, Beeville, TX 78102, USATexas Tech University, Texas AgriLife Research, and Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Lubbock, TX 79403, USAField studies were conducted from 2007 through 2009 to determine weed efficacy and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to herbicide systems that included ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated. Control of devil's claw (Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thellung), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), and puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris L.) was most consistent with ethalfluralin followed by either imazapic or imazethapyr applied postemergence. Peanut stunting was 19% when paraquat alone was applied early-postemergence. Stunting increased to greater than 30% when ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated was followed by S-metolachlor applied preemergence and paraquat applied early-postemergence. Stunting (7%) was also observed when ethalfluralin was followed by flumioxazin plus S-metolachlor applied preemergence with lactofen applied mid-postemergence. Ethalfluralin followed by paraquat applied early-postemergence reduced peanut yield when compared to the nontreated check. Ethalfluralin applied preplant incorporated followed by imazapic applied mid-postemergence provided the greatest yield (6220 kg/ha). None of the herbicide treatments reduced peanut grade (sound mature kernels plus sound splits) when compared with the nontreated check.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/597434
spellingShingle W. J. Grichar
P. A. Dotray
Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
International Journal of Agronomy
title Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
title_full Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
title_fullStr Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
title_full_unstemmed Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
title_short Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance with Ethalfluralin-Based Herbicide Systems
title_sort weed control and peanut tolerance with ethalfluralin based herbicide systems
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/597434
work_keys_str_mv AT wjgrichar weedcontrolandpeanuttolerancewithethalfluralinbasedherbicidesystems
AT padotray weedcontrolandpeanuttolerancewithethalfluralinbasedherbicidesystems