Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review
Background: Perioperative music interventions are promising, with substantial beneficial effects on patients. However, adequate reporting is crucial for interpreting the outcomes and implementing the interventions. Our objective is to analyze the reporting quality of perioperative music intervention...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Complementary Therapies in Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924001018 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832582260850688000 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas L.A. Dirven Roos Geensen Florine Bax Jorrit G. Verhoeven Johannes Jeekel Markus Klimek |
| author_facet | Thomas L.A. Dirven Roos Geensen Florine Bax Jorrit G. Verhoeven Johannes Jeekel Markus Klimek |
| author_sort | Thomas L.A. Dirven |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Perioperative music interventions are promising, with substantial beneficial effects on patients. However, adequate reporting is crucial for interpreting the outcomes and implementing the interventions. Our objective is to analyze the reporting quality of perioperative music interventions and to provide recommendations and a research agenda for future trials. Material and methods: This study utilized data from a systematic review, that was conducted as part of a separate previous analysis by Geensen, Dirven et al. For this analysis, a PROSPERO registration (CRD42023427138) was formalized. The Template for intervention Description and Replication (TiDieR) checklist was adapted and used. Nineteen intervention items were assessed, categorized in the aim, the core and the implementation. Results: Due to narrowed inclusion criteria, ten music intervention studies were included. None of the studies completely reported all intervention items. The reporting of core intervention items were poorly described. Complete description of implementation items, such as fidelity and modifications, was scarce. Conclusions: Perioperative music studies often lack the complete reporting of essential intervention items. This hinders replicability, generalization of the results and might contribute to research waste. We recommend adequate reporting in future studies to avoid these problems, by using our adapted TIDieR checklist. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c020e3c71dca46d4a06429b3a84ecbe8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0965-2299 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Complementary Therapies in Medicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-c020e3c71dca46d4a06429b3a84ecbe82025-01-30T05:12:50ZengElsevierComplementary Therapies in Medicine0965-22992025-03-0188103113Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic reviewThomas L.A. Dirven0Roos Geensen1Florine Bax2Jorrit G. Verhoeven3Johannes Jeekel4Markus Klimek5Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the Netherlands; Correspondence to: Department of Neuroscience, Room EE1202, dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000CA, the Netherlands.Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the NetherlandsDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the NetherlandsDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the NetherlandsDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, the NetherlandsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, the NetherlandsBackground: Perioperative music interventions are promising, with substantial beneficial effects on patients. However, adequate reporting is crucial for interpreting the outcomes and implementing the interventions. Our objective is to analyze the reporting quality of perioperative music interventions and to provide recommendations and a research agenda for future trials. Material and methods: This study utilized data from a systematic review, that was conducted as part of a separate previous analysis by Geensen, Dirven et al. For this analysis, a PROSPERO registration (CRD42023427138) was formalized. The Template for intervention Description and Replication (TiDieR) checklist was adapted and used. Nineteen intervention items were assessed, categorized in the aim, the core and the implementation. Results: Due to narrowed inclusion criteria, ten music intervention studies were included. None of the studies completely reported all intervention items. The reporting of core intervention items were poorly described. Complete description of implementation items, such as fidelity and modifications, was scarce. Conclusions: Perioperative music studies often lack the complete reporting of essential intervention items. This hinders replicability, generalization of the results and might contribute to research waste. We recommend adequate reporting in future studies to avoid these problems, by using our adapted TIDieR checklist.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924001018MusicInterventionsReportingToolChecklistResearch agenda |
| spellingShingle | Thomas L.A. Dirven Roos Geensen Florine Bax Jorrit G. Verhoeven Johannes Jeekel Markus Klimek Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review Complementary Therapies in Medicine Music Interventions Reporting Tool Checklist Research agenda |
| title | Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review |
| title_full | Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review |
| title_short | Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review |
| title_sort | quality of reporting of pre recorded music interventions in surgical patients a systematic review |
| topic | Music Interventions Reporting Tool Checklist Research agenda |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924001018 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasladirven qualityofreportingofprerecordedmusicinterventionsinsurgicalpatientsasystematicreview AT roosgeensen qualityofreportingofprerecordedmusicinterventionsinsurgicalpatientsasystematicreview AT florinebax qualityofreportingofprerecordedmusicinterventionsinsurgicalpatientsasystematicreview AT jorritgverhoeven qualityofreportingofprerecordedmusicinterventionsinsurgicalpatientsasystematicreview AT johannesjeekel qualityofreportingofprerecordedmusicinterventionsinsurgicalpatientsasystematicreview AT markusklimek qualityofreportingofprerecordedmusicinterventionsinsurgicalpatientsasystematicreview |