“We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia

Arcadia can be read as a subverted detective story in which history is reinterpreted rather than deciphered. The sleuth is a ruthlessly ambitious scholar who distorts evidence so as to achieve his ends. Arcadia thus highlights the unreliability of textual meaning, appealing to the reader/spectator’s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aloysia Rousseau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte" 2011-12-01
Series:Sillages Critiques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/2450
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578605904822272
author Aloysia Rousseau
author_facet Aloysia Rousseau
author_sort Aloysia Rousseau
collection DOAJ
description Arcadia can be read as a subverted detective story in which history is reinterpreted rather than deciphered. The sleuth is a ruthlessly ambitious scholar who distorts evidence so as to achieve his ends. Arcadia thus highlights the unreliability of textual meaning, appealing to the reader/spectator’s vigilance and inviting him to participate in the hermeneutical quest. This paper will throw light upon the play’s double time frame as being characteristic of the whodunit before focusing on the figure of Bernard as anti-detective and finally analysing how visual deciphering prevails over scriptural deciphering.
format Article
id doaj-art-c00925b953d946e1a31966f5e9887615
institution Kabale University
issn 1272-3819
1969-6302
language English
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"
record_format Article
series Sillages Critiques
spelling doaj-art-c00925b953d946e1a31966f5e98876152025-01-30T13:46:35ZengCentre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"Sillages Critiques1272-38191969-63022011-12-011310.4000/sillagescritiques.2450“We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s ArcadiaAloysia RousseauArcadia can be read as a subverted detective story in which history is reinterpreted rather than deciphered. The sleuth is a ruthlessly ambitious scholar who distorts evidence so as to achieve his ends. Arcadia thus highlights the unreliability of textual meaning, appealing to the reader/spectator’s vigilance and inviting him to participate in the hermeneutical quest. This paper will throw light upon the play’s double time frame as being characteristic of the whodunit before focusing on the figure of Bernard as anti-detective and finally analysing how visual deciphering prevails over scriptural deciphering.https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/2450ArcadiahermeneuticsTom Stoppardwhodunitsemioticspostmodernism
spellingShingle Aloysia Rousseau
“We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
Sillages Critiques
Arcadia
hermeneutics
Tom Stoppard
whodunit
semiotics
postmodernism
title “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
title_full “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
title_fullStr “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
title_full_unstemmed “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
title_short “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
title_sort we will write it again subverted hermeneutics in tom stoppard s arcadia
topic Arcadia
hermeneutics
Tom Stoppard
whodunit
semiotics
postmodernism
url https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/2450
work_keys_str_mv AT aloysiarousseau wewillwriteitagainsubvertedhermeneuticsintomstoppardsarcadia