“We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia
Arcadia can be read as a subverted detective story in which history is reinterpreted rather than deciphered. The sleuth is a ruthlessly ambitious scholar who distorts evidence so as to achieve his ends. Arcadia thus highlights the unreliability of textual meaning, appealing to the reader/spectator’s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Sillages Critiques |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/2450 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832578605904822272 |
---|---|
author | Aloysia Rousseau |
author_facet | Aloysia Rousseau |
author_sort | Aloysia Rousseau |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Arcadia can be read as a subverted detective story in which history is reinterpreted rather than deciphered. The sleuth is a ruthlessly ambitious scholar who distorts evidence so as to achieve his ends. Arcadia thus highlights the unreliability of textual meaning, appealing to the reader/spectator’s vigilance and inviting him to participate in the hermeneutical quest. This paper will throw light upon the play’s double time frame as being characteristic of the whodunit before focusing on the figure of Bernard as anti-detective and finally analysing how visual deciphering prevails over scriptural deciphering. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-c00925b953d946e1a31966f5e9887615 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1272-3819 1969-6302 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011-12-01 |
publisher | Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte" |
record_format | Article |
series | Sillages Critiques |
spelling | doaj-art-c00925b953d946e1a31966f5e98876152025-01-30T13:46:35ZengCentre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"Sillages Critiques1272-38191969-63022011-12-011310.4000/sillagescritiques.2450“We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s ArcadiaAloysia RousseauArcadia can be read as a subverted detective story in which history is reinterpreted rather than deciphered. The sleuth is a ruthlessly ambitious scholar who distorts evidence so as to achieve his ends. Arcadia thus highlights the unreliability of textual meaning, appealing to the reader/spectator’s vigilance and inviting him to participate in the hermeneutical quest. This paper will throw light upon the play’s double time frame as being characteristic of the whodunit before focusing on the figure of Bernard as anti-detective and finally analysing how visual deciphering prevails over scriptural deciphering.https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/2450ArcadiahermeneuticsTom Stoppardwhodunitsemioticspostmodernism |
spellingShingle | Aloysia Rousseau “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia Sillages Critiques Arcadia hermeneutics Tom Stoppard whodunit semiotics postmodernism |
title | “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia |
title_full | “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia |
title_fullStr | “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia |
title_full_unstemmed | “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia |
title_short | “We will write it again”: subverted hermeneutics in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia |
title_sort | we will write it again subverted hermeneutics in tom stoppard s arcadia |
topic | Arcadia hermeneutics Tom Stoppard whodunit semiotics postmodernism |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/2450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aloysiarousseau wewillwriteitagainsubvertedhermeneuticsintomstoppardsarcadia |