En finir avec l’histoire officielle ? Un bilan critique de l’historiographie internationale sur la révolution mexicaine
For many Mexican researchers, writing the history of the Mexican Revolution is still a process of acculturation : even before proposing a new object of analysis or new hypotheses must first get rid of them heroizing history whose narrative is still used to legitimize the ruling party. No Mexican his...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Conserveries Mémorielles
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Conserveries Mémorielles |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/cm/2453 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | For many Mexican researchers, writing the history of the Mexican Revolution is still a process of acculturation : even before proposing a new object of analysis or new hypotheses must first get rid of them heroizing history whose narrative is still used to legitimize the ruling party. No Mexican historians who have worked on the revolution played a key role in the evolution of the Mexican historiography on this topic. It’s time, on the eve of the centenary of the Constitution of 1917, to take stock of this contribution. Incidentally, it is not unilateral. If authors like F. Katz, F - X Guerra, J. Meyer and A. Knight are among the historians who have most deeply renewed the historiography, Cultural Studies today have an unfortunate impact at the very time when the availability new sources promises analyzes finer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1718-5556 |