Site-Directed Mutagenesis Mediated by Molecular Modeling and Docking and Its Effect on the Protein–Protein Interactions of the bHLH Transcription Factors SPATULA, HECATE1, and INDEHISCENT
The aim of this study was to investigate the biological relevance of predicted sites involved in protein–protein interaction formation by bHLH transcription factors associated with gynoecium development in Arabidopsis (<i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>). We used AlphaFold2 to generate three-di...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Plants |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/12/1756 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The aim of this study was to investigate the biological relevance of predicted sites involved in protein–protein interaction formation by bHLH transcription factors associated with gynoecium development in Arabidopsis (<i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>). We used AlphaFold2 to generate three-dimensional protein structures of the bHLH proteins SPATULA (SPT), HECATE1 (HEC1), and INDEHISCENT (IND). These structures were subjected to molecular docking using the HawkDock server, enabling the identification of potential interaction sites. PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis was used to modify the predicted interaction sites, followed by testing for protein–protein interaction formation using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) assays. Furthermore, these modified versions were overexpressed in Arabidopsis to observe whether gynoecium and fruit development would be affected. BiFC assays with the modified versions revealed a complete loss of the SPT-HEC1 interaction and a strong reduction in the SPT-IND interaction. The overexpression experiments in Arabidopsis showed that the <i>35S::SPT-4A</i> line exhibited strong phenotypes in the development of the medial tissues of the gynoecium, resulting in reduced seed number and shorter fruits. In the <i>35S::HEC1-2A</i> line, a reduced seed number and shorter fruits were also observed, but no other obvious defects were observed. Finally, the <i>35S::IND-3A</i> line was less affected than the <i>35S::IND</i> line. In the latter, medial tissue development was strongly affected, while in the <i>35S::IND-3A</i> line, it was only slightly affected; however, a reduced seed number and shorter fruits were observed. In summary, the predicted interaction sites are relevant and, when modified, affect gynoecium development in Arabidopsis. The findings demonstrate that predictive computational tools represent a viable strategy for a deeper understanding of protein–protein interactions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2223-7747 |