Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension

Abstract Background Patients with brain damage often require mechanical ventilation. Although lung-protective ventilation is recommended, the application of increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been associated with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) due to altered cerebral venous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Álmos Schranc, John Daniels, Roberta Südy, Fabienne Fontao, Philippe Bijlenga, Guillaume Plourde, Hervé Quintard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-12-01
Series:Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00703-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850257613982269440
author Álmos Schranc
John Daniels
Roberta Südy
Fabienne Fontao
Philippe Bijlenga
Guillaume Plourde
Hervé Quintard
author_facet Álmos Schranc
John Daniels
Roberta Südy
Fabienne Fontao
Philippe Bijlenga
Guillaume Plourde
Hervé Quintard
author_sort Álmos Schranc
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Patients with brain damage often require mechanical ventilation. Although lung-protective ventilation is recommended, the application of increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been associated with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) due to altered cerebral venous return. This study investigates the effects of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) using negative end-expiratory pressures (NEEP), on cerebral hemodynamics in a swine model of intracranial hypertension. Methods A model of intracranial hypertension involving bilateral trepan bolt holes was performed in 14 pigs. Pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) with PEEP and FCV using PEEP and then NEEP were applied. Intracranial pressure and oxygenation, as well as systemic hemodynamics and gas exchange parameters, were continuously monitored. Data were collected at baseline and at varying PEEP levels for both PCV-VG and FCV ventilation modalities. Following this, FCV ventilation and NEEP levels of -3, -6 and -9 cmH2O were applied. Results ICP remained stable with low PEEP levels, but significantly decreased with NEEP. Lower ICP following NEEP improved cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral tissue oxygenation (p < 0.05 for all). FCV with NEEP at EEP-6 and EEP-9 significantly improved cardiac output and mean arterial pressure (MAP), compared to PCV-VG and FCV using PEEP (p < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in gas exchange parameters between modalities (PCV-VG vs FCV), and between the application of PEEP or NEEP. No significant correlations were observed between ΔICP and ΔMAP. Conclusion The application of FCV with NEEP appears to be a safe ventilation mode and offers an additional tool for controlling severe intracranial pressure episodes. These findings warrant validation in future studies and may lead to important potential applications in clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-be514b6065fe41e580c46e60a642d611
institution OA Journals
issn 2197-425X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
spelling doaj-art-be514b6065fe41e580c46e60a642d6112025-08-20T01:56:23ZengSpringerOpenIntensive Care Medicine Experimental2197-425X2024-12-011211810.1186/s40635-024-00703-xSafety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertensionÁlmos Schranc0John Daniels1Roberta Südy2Fabienne Fontao3Philippe Bijlenga4Guillaume Plourde5Hervé Quintard6Unit for Anaesthesiological Investigation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of GenevaUnit for Anaesthesiological Investigation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of GenevaUnit for Anaesthesiological Investigation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of GenevaUnit for Anaesthesiological Investigation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University HospitalsDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalDivision of Intensive Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsAbstract Background Patients with brain damage often require mechanical ventilation. Although lung-protective ventilation is recommended, the application of increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been associated with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) due to altered cerebral venous return. This study investigates the effects of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) using negative end-expiratory pressures (NEEP), on cerebral hemodynamics in a swine model of intracranial hypertension. Methods A model of intracranial hypertension involving bilateral trepan bolt holes was performed in 14 pigs. Pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) with PEEP and FCV using PEEP and then NEEP were applied. Intracranial pressure and oxygenation, as well as systemic hemodynamics and gas exchange parameters, were continuously monitored. Data were collected at baseline and at varying PEEP levels for both PCV-VG and FCV ventilation modalities. Following this, FCV ventilation and NEEP levels of -3, -6 and -9 cmH2O were applied. Results ICP remained stable with low PEEP levels, but significantly decreased with NEEP. Lower ICP following NEEP improved cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral tissue oxygenation (p < 0.05 for all). FCV with NEEP at EEP-6 and EEP-9 significantly improved cardiac output and mean arterial pressure (MAP), compared to PCV-VG and FCV using PEEP (p < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in gas exchange parameters between modalities (PCV-VG vs FCV), and between the application of PEEP or NEEP. No significant correlations were observed between ΔICP and ΔMAP. Conclusion The application of FCV with NEEP appears to be a safe ventilation mode and offers an additional tool for controlling severe intracranial pressure episodes. These findings warrant validation in future studies and may lead to important potential applications in clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00703-xFlow-controlled ventilationPositive end-expiratory pressureNegative end-expiratory pressureCerebral hemodynamicsIntracranial hypertensionMechanical ventilation
spellingShingle Álmos Schranc
John Daniels
Roberta Südy
Fabienne Fontao
Philippe Bijlenga
Guillaume Plourde
Hervé Quintard
Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Flow-controlled ventilation
Positive end-expiratory pressure
Negative end-expiratory pressure
Cerebral hemodynamics
Intracranial hypertension
Mechanical ventilation
title Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
title_full Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
title_fullStr Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
title_short Safety of flow-controlled ventilation with positive and negative end-expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
title_sort safety of flow controlled ventilation with positive and negative end expiratory pressure in a swine model of intracranial hypertension
topic Flow-controlled ventilation
Positive end-expiratory pressure
Negative end-expiratory pressure
Cerebral hemodynamics
Intracranial hypertension
Mechanical ventilation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00703-x
work_keys_str_mv AT almosschranc safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension
AT johndaniels safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension
AT robertasudy safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension
AT fabiennefontao safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension
AT philippebijlenga safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension
AT guillaumeplourde safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension
AT hervequintard safetyofflowcontrolledventilationwithpositiveandnegativeendexpiratorypressureinaswinemodelofintracranialhypertension