On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions

Moore (1920) defined the reciprocal of any matrix over the complex field by three conditions, but the beauty of the definition was not realized until Penrose (1955) defined the same inverse using four conditions. The reciprocal is now often called the Moore-Penrose inverse, and has been widely used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaoxiong Gan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2002-01-01
Series:International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0161171202007317
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545669608374272
author Gaoxiong Gan
author_facet Gaoxiong Gan
author_sort Gaoxiong Gan
collection DOAJ
description Moore (1920) defined the reciprocal of any matrix over the complex field by three conditions, but the beauty of the definition was not realized until Penrose (1955) defined the same inverse using four conditions. The reciprocal is now often called the Moore-Penrose inverse, and has been widely used in various areas. This note comments on the definitions of Moore-Penrose inverse, and gives a new characterization for two types of weak Moore-Penrose inverses, which exposes an important relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions. It also attempts to emphasize the merit of Moore's definition, which has been overlooked mainly due to Moore's unique notation. Two examples are given to demonstrate some combined applications of Moore's and Penrose's conditions, including a correction for an incorrect proof of Ben-Israel's (1986) characterization for Moore's conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-be4b7ee75bbb4eca8a38f51b40a690b1
institution Kabale University
issn 0161-1712
1687-0425
language English
publishDate 2002-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-be4b7ee75bbb4eca8a38f51b40a690b12025-02-03T07:25:12ZengWileyInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences0161-17121687-04252002-01-0130850550910.1155/S0161171202007317On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditionsGaoxiong Gan0Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri-Rolla, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla 65409-0020, MO, USAMoore (1920) defined the reciprocal of any matrix over the complex field by three conditions, but the beauty of the definition was not realized until Penrose (1955) defined the same inverse using four conditions. The reciprocal is now often called the Moore-Penrose inverse, and has been widely used in various areas. This note comments on the definitions of Moore-Penrose inverse, and gives a new characterization for two types of weak Moore-Penrose inverses, which exposes an important relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions. It also attempts to emphasize the merit of Moore's definition, which has been overlooked mainly due to Moore's unique notation. Two examples are given to demonstrate some combined applications of Moore's and Penrose's conditions, including a correction for an incorrect proof of Ben-Israel's (1986) characterization for Moore's conditions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0161171202007317
spellingShingle Gaoxiong Gan
On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
title On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions
title_full On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions
title_fullStr On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions
title_full_unstemmed On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions
title_short On the relation between Moore's and Penrose's conditions
title_sort on the relation between moore s and penrose s conditions
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0161171202007317
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoxionggan ontherelationbetweenmooresandpenrosesconditions