On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation

Experimental data show that gemini surfactants have critical micelle concentrations that are almost tenfold lower than the CMCs of single chain ones. It is believed that the spacer groups play an important role in this subject. Short hydrophilic or long hydrophobic spacers can reduce CMC dramaticall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani, Maryam Farsad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/525948
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548425778855936
author Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani
Maryam Farsad
author_facet Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani
Maryam Farsad
author_sort Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani
collection DOAJ
description Experimental data show that gemini surfactants have critical micelle concentrations that are almost tenfold lower than the CMCs of single chain ones. It is believed that the spacer groups play an important role in this subject. Short hydrophilic or long hydrophobic spacers can reduce CMC dramatically. In this paper, self-assembling processes of double-chain and one-chain surfactants with the same head to tail ratio are compared. Dimeric chain structure is exactly double of single chain. In other words, hydrophilic-lyophilic balances of two chain models are the same. Two single chains are connected head-to-head to form a dimeric chain, without introducing extra head or tail beads as a spacer group. Premicellar, micellar, and shape/phase transition ranges of both models are investigated. To do this, lattice Monte Carlo simulation in canonical ensemble has been used. Results show that without introducing extra beads as spacer group, the CMC of (H3T3)2 as a dimeric surfactant is much lower than the CMC of its similar single chain, H3T3. For dimeric case of study, it is shown that bolaform aggregates are formed.
format Article
id doaj-art-bdf0b1cf5ef44647adfc5917c50563eb
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-9063
2090-9071
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-bdf0b1cf5ef44647adfc5917c50563eb2025-02-03T06:14:14ZengWileyJournal of Chemistry2090-90632090-90712013-01-01201310.1155/2013/525948525948On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo SimulationReza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani0Maryam Farsad1Department of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, P.O. Box 19395-3697, Tehran, IranDepartment of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, P.O. Box 19395-3697, Tehran, IranExperimental data show that gemini surfactants have critical micelle concentrations that are almost tenfold lower than the CMCs of single chain ones. It is believed that the spacer groups play an important role in this subject. Short hydrophilic or long hydrophobic spacers can reduce CMC dramatically. In this paper, self-assembling processes of double-chain and one-chain surfactants with the same head to tail ratio are compared. Dimeric chain structure is exactly double of single chain. In other words, hydrophilic-lyophilic balances of two chain models are the same. Two single chains are connected head-to-head to form a dimeric chain, without introducing extra head or tail beads as a spacer group. Premicellar, micellar, and shape/phase transition ranges of both models are investigated. To do this, lattice Monte Carlo simulation in canonical ensemble has been used. Results show that without introducing extra beads as spacer group, the CMC of (H3T3)2 as a dimeric surfactant is much lower than the CMC of its similar single chain, H3T3. For dimeric case of study, it is shown that bolaform aggregates are formed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/525948
spellingShingle Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani
Maryam Farsad
On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation
Journal of Chemistry
title On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation
title_full On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation
title_fullStr On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation
title_full_unstemmed On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation
title_short On the Difference between Self-Assembling Process of Monomeric and Dimeric Surfactants with the Same Head to Tail Ratio: A Lattice Monte Carlo Simulation
title_sort on the difference between self assembling process of monomeric and dimeric surfactants with the same head to tail ratio a lattice monte carlo simulation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/525948
work_keys_str_mv AT rezabehjatmaneshardakani onthedifferencebetweenselfassemblingprocessofmonomericanddimericsurfactantswiththesameheadtotailratioalatticemontecarlosimulation
AT maryamfarsad onthedifferencebetweenselfassemblingprocessofmonomericanddimericsurfactantswiththesameheadtotailratioalatticemontecarlosimulation