The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion

Abstract Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were extirpated from much of their range in the North Pacific by the early 1900s but have made a remarkable recovery in Southeast Alaska. Sea otter populations have been particularly successful in Glacier Bay, Alaska, a protected tidewater glacier fjord with a di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clinton B. Leach, Benjamin P. Weitzman, James L. Bodkin, Daniel Esler, George G. Esslinger, Kimberly A. Kloecker, Daniel H. Monson, Jamie N. Womble, Mevin B. Hooten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70084
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584202949754880
author Clinton B. Leach
Benjamin P. Weitzman
James L. Bodkin
Daniel Esler
George G. Esslinger
Kimberly A. Kloecker
Daniel H. Monson
Jamie N. Womble
Mevin B. Hooten
author_facet Clinton B. Leach
Benjamin P. Weitzman
James L. Bodkin
Daniel Esler
George G. Esslinger
Kimberly A. Kloecker
Daniel H. Monson
Jamie N. Womble
Mevin B. Hooten
author_sort Clinton B. Leach
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were extirpated from much of their range in the North Pacific by the early 1900s but have made a remarkable recovery in Southeast Alaska. Sea otter populations have been particularly successful in Glacier Bay, Alaska, a protected tidewater glacier fjord with a diverse and productive nearshore habitat. Collection of sea otter foraging observations in Glacier Bay began in 1993, along with high‐resolution aerial surveys that provide estimates of sea otter abundance and distribution. We integrated these two data sources to investigate how sea otter diet changed in space and time as sea otters established and spread across Glacier Bay. Specifically, we developed a multilevel Bayesian model to capture how sea otter diet at a location (the number, type, and size of prey collected) changed as a function of local cumulative otter abundance and the year in which the location was first occupied. This framework enabled us to estimate the sequence of sea otter prey selection and switching as prey populations responded to sea otter foraging pressure. We found that local sea otter diet changed substantially as the population established, shifting away from large urchins, crabs, and clams to Modiolus mussels and small urchins, and lastly to small clams and Mytilus mussels. We also found that sea otter diet at newly occupied sites changed as otters spread over the main channel and into the arms of Glacier Bay. Further, by 2019, sea otters across the bay were primarily foraging on small prey, regardless of the local occupancy history. The absence of a spatial gradient in the size of prey captured late in the study suggests that feedbacks between the top‐down effects of sea otter foraging, sea otter dispersal processes, and local variation in habitat productivity may have homogenized the size structure of available prey across Glacier Bay.
format Article
id doaj-art-bd6874b8d695448bb322d76ca8afb743
institution Kabale University
issn 2150-8925
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj-art-bd6874b8d695448bb322d76ca8afb7432025-01-27T14:51:33ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252024-12-011512n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70084The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansionClinton B. Leach0Benjamin P. Weitzman1James L. Bodkin2Daniel Esler3George G. Esslinger4Kimberly A. Kloecker5Daniel H. Monson6Jamie N. Womble7Mevin B. Hooten8Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USAU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marine Mammals Management Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USASoutheast Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service Juneau Alaska USADepartment of Statistics and Data Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USAAbstract Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were extirpated from much of their range in the North Pacific by the early 1900s but have made a remarkable recovery in Southeast Alaska. Sea otter populations have been particularly successful in Glacier Bay, Alaska, a protected tidewater glacier fjord with a diverse and productive nearshore habitat. Collection of sea otter foraging observations in Glacier Bay began in 1993, along with high‐resolution aerial surveys that provide estimates of sea otter abundance and distribution. We integrated these two data sources to investigate how sea otter diet changed in space and time as sea otters established and spread across Glacier Bay. Specifically, we developed a multilevel Bayesian model to capture how sea otter diet at a location (the number, type, and size of prey collected) changed as a function of local cumulative otter abundance and the year in which the location was first occupied. This framework enabled us to estimate the sequence of sea otter prey selection and switching as prey populations responded to sea otter foraging pressure. We found that local sea otter diet changed substantially as the population established, shifting away from large urchins, crabs, and clams to Modiolus mussels and small urchins, and lastly to small clams and Mytilus mussels. We also found that sea otter diet at newly occupied sites changed as otters spread over the main channel and into the arms of Glacier Bay. Further, by 2019, sea otters across the bay were primarily foraging on small prey, regardless of the local occupancy history. The absence of a spatial gradient in the size of prey captured late in the study suggests that feedbacks between the top‐down effects of sea otter foraging, sea otter dispersal processes, and local variation in habitat productivity may have homogenized the size structure of available prey across Glacier Bay.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70084apex predatorBayesian hierarchical modelsforaging ecologynearshore ecosystemspopulation diffusionprey preferences and switching
spellingShingle Clinton B. Leach
Benjamin P. Weitzman
James L. Bodkin
Daniel Esler
George G. Esslinger
Kimberly A. Kloecker
Daniel H. Monson
Jamie N. Womble
Mevin B. Hooten
The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
Ecosphere
apex predator
Bayesian hierarchical models
foraging ecology
nearshore ecosystems
population diffusion
prey preferences and switching
title The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
title_full The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
title_fullStr The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
title_full_unstemmed The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
title_short The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
title_sort dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
topic apex predator
Bayesian hierarchical models
foraging ecology
nearshore ecosystems
population diffusion
prey preferences and switching
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70084
work_keys_str_mv AT clintonbleach thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT benjaminpweitzman thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT jameslbodkin thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT danielesler thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT georgegesslinger thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT kimberlyakloecker thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT danielhmonson thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT jamienwomble thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT mevinbhooten thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT clintonbleach dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT benjaminpweitzman dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT jameslbodkin dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT danielesler dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT georgegesslinger dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT kimberlyakloecker dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT danielhmonson dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT jamienwomble dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion
AT mevinbhooten dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion