The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion
Abstract Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were extirpated from much of their range in the North Pacific by the early 1900s but have made a remarkable recovery in Southeast Alaska. Sea otter populations have been particularly successful in Glacier Bay, Alaska, a protected tidewater glacier fjord with a di...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Ecosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70084 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832584202949754880 |
---|---|
author | Clinton B. Leach Benjamin P. Weitzman James L. Bodkin Daniel Esler George G. Esslinger Kimberly A. Kloecker Daniel H. Monson Jamie N. Womble Mevin B. Hooten |
author_facet | Clinton B. Leach Benjamin P. Weitzman James L. Bodkin Daniel Esler George G. Esslinger Kimberly A. Kloecker Daniel H. Monson Jamie N. Womble Mevin B. Hooten |
author_sort | Clinton B. Leach |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were extirpated from much of their range in the North Pacific by the early 1900s but have made a remarkable recovery in Southeast Alaska. Sea otter populations have been particularly successful in Glacier Bay, Alaska, a protected tidewater glacier fjord with a diverse and productive nearshore habitat. Collection of sea otter foraging observations in Glacier Bay began in 1993, along with high‐resolution aerial surveys that provide estimates of sea otter abundance and distribution. We integrated these two data sources to investigate how sea otter diet changed in space and time as sea otters established and spread across Glacier Bay. Specifically, we developed a multilevel Bayesian model to capture how sea otter diet at a location (the number, type, and size of prey collected) changed as a function of local cumulative otter abundance and the year in which the location was first occupied. This framework enabled us to estimate the sequence of sea otter prey selection and switching as prey populations responded to sea otter foraging pressure. We found that local sea otter diet changed substantially as the population established, shifting away from large urchins, crabs, and clams to Modiolus mussels and small urchins, and lastly to small clams and Mytilus mussels. We also found that sea otter diet at newly occupied sites changed as otters spread over the main channel and into the arms of Glacier Bay. Further, by 2019, sea otters across the bay were primarily foraging on small prey, regardless of the local occupancy history. The absence of a spatial gradient in the size of prey captured late in the study suggests that feedbacks between the top‐down effects of sea otter foraging, sea otter dispersal processes, and local variation in habitat productivity may have homogenized the size structure of available prey across Glacier Bay. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-bd6874b8d695448bb322d76ca8afb743 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2150-8925 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecosphere |
spelling | doaj-art-bd6874b8d695448bb322d76ca8afb7432025-01-27T14:51:33ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252024-12-011512n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70084The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansionClinton B. Leach0Benjamin P. Weitzman1James L. Bodkin2Daniel Esler3George G. Esslinger4Kimberly A. Kloecker5Daniel H. Monson6Jamie N. Womble7Mevin B. Hooten8Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USAU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marine Mammals Management Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USAU.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center Anchorage Alaska USASoutheast Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service Juneau Alaska USADepartment of Statistics and Data Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USAAbstract Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) were extirpated from much of their range in the North Pacific by the early 1900s but have made a remarkable recovery in Southeast Alaska. Sea otter populations have been particularly successful in Glacier Bay, Alaska, a protected tidewater glacier fjord with a diverse and productive nearshore habitat. Collection of sea otter foraging observations in Glacier Bay began in 1993, along with high‐resolution aerial surveys that provide estimates of sea otter abundance and distribution. We integrated these two data sources to investigate how sea otter diet changed in space and time as sea otters established and spread across Glacier Bay. Specifically, we developed a multilevel Bayesian model to capture how sea otter diet at a location (the number, type, and size of prey collected) changed as a function of local cumulative otter abundance and the year in which the location was first occupied. This framework enabled us to estimate the sequence of sea otter prey selection and switching as prey populations responded to sea otter foraging pressure. We found that local sea otter diet changed substantially as the population established, shifting away from large urchins, crabs, and clams to Modiolus mussels and small urchins, and lastly to small clams and Mytilus mussels. We also found that sea otter diet at newly occupied sites changed as otters spread over the main channel and into the arms of Glacier Bay. Further, by 2019, sea otters across the bay were primarily foraging on small prey, regardless of the local occupancy history. The absence of a spatial gradient in the size of prey captured late in the study suggests that feedbacks between the top‐down effects of sea otter foraging, sea otter dispersal processes, and local variation in habitat productivity may have homogenized the size structure of available prey across Glacier Bay.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70084apex predatorBayesian hierarchical modelsforaging ecologynearshore ecosystemspopulation diffusionprey preferences and switching |
spellingShingle | Clinton B. Leach Benjamin P. Weitzman James L. Bodkin Daniel Esler George G. Esslinger Kimberly A. Kloecker Daniel H. Monson Jamie N. Womble Mevin B. Hooten The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion Ecosphere apex predator Bayesian hierarchical models foraging ecology nearshore ecosystems population diffusion prey preferences and switching |
title | The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion |
title_full | The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion |
title_fullStr | The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion |
title_full_unstemmed | The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion |
title_short | The dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion |
title_sort | dynamics of sea otter prey selection under population growth and expansion |
topic | apex predator Bayesian hierarchical models foraging ecology nearshore ecosystems population diffusion prey preferences and switching |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clintonbleach thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT benjaminpweitzman thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT jameslbodkin thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT danielesler thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT georgegesslinger thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT kimberlyakloecker thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT danielhmonson thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT jamienwomble thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT mevinbhooten thedynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT clintonbleach dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT benjaminpweitzman dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT jameslbodkin dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT danielesler dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT georgegesslinger dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT kimberlyakloecker dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT danielhmonson dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT jamienwomble dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion AT mevinbhooten dynamicsofseaotterpreyselectionunderpopulationgrowthandexpansion |