Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review

Abstract Objective: This systematic review investigates the characteristics, effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to encourage healthier eating in small, independent restaurants and takeaways. Design: We searched five databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Science Citation I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cinja Jostock, Hannah Forde, Nia Roberts, Susan A Jebb, Rachel Pechey, Lauren Bandy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Public Health Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980025000035/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584748753485824
author Cinja Jostock
Hannah Forde
Nia Roberts
Susan A Jebb
Rachel Pechey
Lauren Bandy
author_facet Cinja Jostock
Hannah Forde
Nia Roberts
Susan A Jebb
Rachel Pechey
Lauren Bandy
author_sort Cinja Jostock
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: This systematic review investigates the characteristics, effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to encourage healthier eating in small, independent restaurants and takeaways. Design: We searched five databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index) in June 2022. Eligible studies had to measure changes in sales, availability, nutritional quality, portion sizes or dietary intake of interventions targeting customer behaviour or restaurant environments. We evaluated study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results are synthesised narratively, and interventions’ impact on personal autonomy is assessed using the Nuffield intervention ladder. Setting: Small, independent or local restaurants or hot food takeaway outlets, with no restrictions by year or country. Participants: Anyone selling or purchasing food in intervention settings (e.g. restaurant staff/owners, customers). Results: We screened 4624 records and included 12 studies describing 13 interventions in 351 businesses. Most studies were of poor quality. Customer-level intervention components mostly operated on the lower rungs of the Nuffield ladder, and most had limited positive effects on increasing demand, measured as sales or orders of healthy options. Whilst rare, most interventions measuring business outcomes operated on higher ladder rungs and showed small positive results. There was insufficient evidence to investigate differences in impact by intervention intrusiveness. Acceptability was greater for interventions that were low-effort, inexpensive and perceived as not negatively impacting on customer satisfaction. Conclusions: Despite some evidence of small positive effects of healthy eating interventions on healthier purchases or restaurant/hot food takeaway practices, a weak evidence base hinders robust inference.
format Article
id doaj-art-bcd3c14c312e42e78d5e11546b288702
institution Kabale University
issn 1368-9800
1475-2727
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Public Health Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-bcd3c14c312e42e78d5e11546b2887022025-01-27T11:38:12ZengCambridge University PressPublic Health Nutrition1368-98001475-27272025-01-012810.1017/S1368980025000035Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic reviewCinja Jostock0Hannah Forde1Nia Roberts2Susan A Jebb3Rachel Pechey4Lauren Bandy5Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Abstract Objective: This systematic review investigates the characteristics, effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to encourage healthier eating in small, independent restaurants and takeaways. Design: We searched five databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index) in June 2022. Eligible studies had to measure changes in sales, availability, nutritional quality, portion sizes or dietary intake of interventions targeting customer behaviour or restaurant environments. We evaluated study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results are synthesised narratively, and interventions’ impact on personal autonomy is assessed using the Nuffield intervention ladder. Setting: Small, independent or local restaurants or hot food takeaway outlets, with no restrictions by year or country. Participants: Anyone selling or purchasing food in intervention settings (e.g. restaurant staff/owners, customers). Results: We screened 4624 records and included 12 studies describing 13 interventions in 351 businesses. Most studies were of poor quality. Customer-level intervention components mostly operated on the lower rungs of the Nuffield ladder, and most had limited positive effects on increasing demand, measured as sales or orders of healthy options. Whilst rare, most interventions measuring business outcomes operated on higher ladder rungs and showed small positive results. There was insufficient evidence to investigate differences in impact by intervention intrusiveness. Acceptability was greater for interventions that were low-effort, inexpensive and perceived as not negatively impacting on customer satisfaction. Conclusions: Despite some evidence of small positive effects of healthy eating interventions on healthier purchases or restaurant/hot food takeaway practices, a weak evidence base hinders robust inference. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980025000035/type/journal_articleHealthy eating interventionsRestaurantsHot food takeawaysSystematic reviewFood environmentFood purchasing
spellingShingle Cinja Jostock
Hannah Forde
Nia Roberts
Susan A Jebb
Rachel Pechey
Lauren Bandy
Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review
Public Health Nutrition
Healthy eating interventions
Restaurants
Hot food takeaways
Systematic review
Food environment
Food purchasing
title Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review
title_full Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review
title_fullStr Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review
title_short Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review
title_sort healthy eating interventions conducted in small local restaurants and hot food takeaways a systematic review
topic Healthy eating interventions
Restaurants
Hot food takeaways
Systematic review
Food environment
Food purchasing
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980025000035/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT cinjajostock healthyeatinginterventionsconductedinsmalllocalrestaurantsandhotfoodtakeawaysasystematicreview
AT hannahforde healthyeatinginterventionsconductedinsmalllocalrestaurantsandhotfoodtakeawaysasystematicreview
AT niaroberts healthyeatinginterventionsconductedinsmalllocalrestaurantsandhotfoodtakeawaysasystematicreview
AT susanajebb healthyeatinginterventionsconductedinsmalllocalrestaurantsandhotfoodtakeawaysasystematicreview
AT rachelpechey healthyeatinginterventionsconductedinsmalllocalrestaurantsandhotfoodtakeawaysasystematicreview
AT laurenbandy healthyeatinginterventionsconductedinsmalllocalrestaurantsandhotfoodtakeawaysasystematicreview