Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology

IntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xianqing Luo, Jiajie Ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468614/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591726955462656
author Xianqing Luo
Jiajie Ji
author_facet Xianqing Luo
Jiajie Ji
author_sort Xianqing Luo
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles (RAs) from five top ranking journals in the field of Nanotechnology, we explored the macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in Nanotechnology.ResultsIt was found that (i) scientists in Nanotechnology have a propensity to employ a merged [R&D] structure to immediately discuss and contribute new knowledge tentatively in the specific contextualised situation after research results were presented, (ii) Even though RAs in Nanotechnology largely follows IMRD structure by abiding writing conventions in the research world, disciplinary variations were found regarding the rhetorical structures, specifically, scientists in Nanotechnology tend to employ more moves and steps in establishing research niche, detailed description of research methods, suggesting future research, but less moves and steps related to promotional strategies (M3S4, M3S5, M3S6).DiscussionThe research results have significant implications for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors to make informed choices by using disciplinary empirical-based decisions to guide novice writers and students at tertiary level to write RAs by following disciplinary conventions of research communities in Nanotechnology so as to avoid overgeneralization.
format Article
id doaj-art-bba7dd03858647598804544865cb4e5d
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj-art-bba7dd03858647598804544865cb4e5d2025-01-22T07:11:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-01-011610.3389/fpsyg.2025.14686141468614Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnologyXianqing Luo0Jiajie Ji1School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, ChinaSchool of Foreign Languages, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, ChinaIntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles (RAs) from five top ranking journals in the field of Nanotechnology, we explored the macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in Nanotechnology.ResultsIt was found that (i) scientists in Nanotechnology have a propensity to employ a merged [R&D] structure to immediately discuss and contribute new knowledge tentatively in the specific contextualised situation after research results were presented, (ii) Even though RAs in Nanotechnology largely follows IMRD structure by abiding writing conventions in the research world, disciplinary variations were found regarding the rhetorical structures, specifically, scientists in Nanotechnology tend to employ more moves and steps in establishing research niche, detailed description of research methods, suggesting future research, but less moves and steps related to promotional strategies (M3S4, M3S5, M3S6).DiscussionThe research results have significant implications for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors to make informed choices by using disciplinary empirical-based decisions to guide novice writers and students at tertiary level to write RAs by following disciplinary conventions of research communities in Nanotechnology so as to avoid overgeneralization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468614/fullmacrostructuregenre analysisrhetorical movesnanotechnology RAspedagogical implications
spellingShingle Xianqing Luo
Jiajie Ji
Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
Frontiers in Psychology
macrostructure
genre analysis
rhetorical moves
nanotechnology RAs
pedagogical implications
title Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
title_full Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
title_fullStr Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
title_full_unstemmed Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
title_short Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
title_sort macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
topic macrostructure
genre analysis
rhetorical moves
nanotechnology RAs
pedagogical implications
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468614/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xianqingluo macrostructuresandrhetoricalmovesinresearcharticlesinnanotechnology
AT jiajieji macrostructuresandrhetoricalmovesinresearcharticlesinnanotechnology