Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology
IntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468614/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832591726955462656 |
---|---|
author | Xianqing Luo Jiajie Ji |
author_facet | Xianqing Luo Jiajie Ji |
author_sort | Xianqing Luo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles (RAs) from five top ranking journals in the field of Nanotechnology, we explored the macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in Nanotechnology.ResultsIt was found that (i) scientists in Nanotechnology have a propensity to employ a merged [R&D] structure to immediately discuss and contribute new knowledge tentatively in the specific contextualised situation after research results were presented, (ii) Even though RAs in Nanotechnology largely follows IMRD structure by abiding writing conventions in the research world, disciplinary variations were found regarding the rhetorical structures, specifically, scientists in Nanotechnology tend to employ more moves and steps in establishing research niche, detailed description of research methods, suggesting future research, but less moves and steps related to promotional strategies (M3S4, M3S5, M3S6).DiscussionThe research results have significant implications for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors to make informed choices by using disciplinary empirical-based decisions to guide novice writers and students at tertiary level to write RAs by following disciplinary conventions of research communities in Nanotechnology so as to avoid overgeneralization. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-bba7dd03858647598804544865cb4e5d |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1664-1078 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Psychology |
spelling | doaj-art-bba7dd03858647598804544865cb4e5d2025-01-22T07:11:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-01-011610.3389/fpsyg.2025.14686141468614Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnologyXianqing Luo0Jiajie Ji1School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, ChinaSchool of Foreign Languages, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, ChinaIntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles (RAs) from five top ranking journals in the field of Nanotechnology, we explored the macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in Nanotechnology.ResultsIt was found that (i) scientists in Nanotechnology have a propensity to employ a merged [R&D] structure to immediately discuss and contribute new knowledge tentatively in the specific contextualised situation after research results were presented, (ii) Even though RAs in Nanotechnology largely follows IMRD structure by abiding writing conventions in the research world, disciplinary variations were found regarding the rhetorical structures, specifically, scientists in Nanotechnology tend to employ more moves and steps in establishing research niche, detailed description of research methods, suggesting future research, but less moves and steps related to promotional strategies (M3S4, M3S5, M3S6).DiscussionThe research results have significant implications for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors to make informed choices by using disciplinary empirical-based decisions to guide novice writers and students at tertiary level to write RAs by following disciplinary conventions of research communities in Nanotechnology so as to avoid overgeneralization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468614/fullmacrostructuregenre analysisrhetorical movesnanotechnology RAspedagogical implications |
spellingShingle | Xianqing Luo Jiajie Ji Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology Frontiers in Psychology macrostructure genre analysis rhetorical moves nanotechnology RAs pedagogical implications |
title | Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology |
title_full | Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology |
title_fullStr | Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology |
title_full_unstemmed | Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology |
title_short | Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology |
title_sort | macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology |
topic | macrostructure genre analysis rhetorical moves nanotechnology RAs pedagogical implications |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468614/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xianqingluo macrostructuresandrhetoricalmovesinresearcharticlesinnanotechnology AT jiajieji macrostructuresandrhetoricalmovesinresearcharticlesinnanotechnology |