Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of soil and water conservation (soil bund with desho grass and soil bund only) at different landscape positions on selected soil properties and farmers’ perception in the Hobicheka sub-watershed (with an area of 400 ha) of Kechabira District. Composite soil s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamrat Sinore, Dinsa Doboch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9295650
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547598742847488
author Tamrat Sinore
Dinsa Doboch
author_facet Tamrat Sinore
Dinsa Doboch
author_sort Tamrat Sinore
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to evaluate the effects of soil and water conservation (soil bund with desho grass and soil bund only) at different landscape positions on selected soil properties and farmers’ perception in the Hobicheka sub-watershed (with an area of 400 ha) of Kechabira District. Composite soil samples were taken from soil bunds with desho grass and soil bunds only at three landscape positions with three replications, whereas 117 respondents were identified using simple random sampling. The result revealed that the clay, soil moisture content, soil pH, OC, TN, Av.P, and CEC were higher in soil bund with desho grass as compared to adjacent soil bund only, whereas, bulk density, silt, and sand contents were higher in adjacent soil bund only compared to soil bund with desho grass. About 83.5% of the respondents were users of soil and water conservation measures and among them, 40.19% perceived that soil bund with desho grass has an effect on soil properties, while 25.35% perceived that soil bund only had better soil and water conservation practices. Respondents’ years of experience, education level, and access to soil and water conservation extension services significantly (p≤0.1) affected their perception of the use of soil bunds with desho grass. Therefore, soil bund with desho grass at appropriate landscape positions by considering farmer perception improves the soil’s physicochemical properties.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb6021359faf47918dbeff5acc68d6bb
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-7675
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Applied and Environmental Soil Science
spelling doaj-art-bb6021359faf47918dbeff5acc68d6bb2025-02-03T06:44:02ZengWileyApplied and Environmental Soil Science1687-76752021-01-01202110.1155/2021/9295650Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern EthiopiaTamrat Sinore0Dinsa Doboch1Department of Natural Resource ManagementDepartment of Natural Resource ManagementThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of soil and water conservation (soil bund with desho grass and soil bund only) at different landscape positions on selected soil properties and farmers’ perception in the Hobicheka sub-watershed (with an area of 400 ha) of Kechabira District. Composite soil samples were taken from soil bunds with desho grass and soil bunds only at three landscape positions with three replications, whereas 117 respondents were identified using simple random sampling. The result revealed that the clay, soil moisture content, soil pH, OC, TN, Av.P, and CEC were higher in soil bund with desho grass as compared to adjacent soil bund only, whereas, bulk density, silt, and sand contents were higher in adjacent soil bund only compared to soil bund with desho grass. About 83.5% of the respondents were users of soil and water conservation measures and among them, 40.19% perceived that soil bund with desho grass has an effect on soil properties, while 25.35% perceived that soil bund only had better soil and water conservation practices. Respondents’ years of experience, education level, and access to soil and water conservation extension services significantly (p≤0.1) affected their perception of the use of soil bunds with desho grass. Therefore, soil bund with desho grass at appropriate landscape positions by considering farmer perception improves the soil’s physicochemical properties.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9295650
spellingShingle Tamrat Sinore
Dinsa Doboch
Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia
Applied and Environmental Soil Science
title Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia
title_full Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia
title_short Effects of Soil and Water Conservation at Different Landscape Positions on Soil Properties and Farmers’ Perception in Hobicheka Sub-Watershed, Southern Ethiopia
title_sort effects of soil and water conservation at different landscape positions on soil properties and farmers perception in hobicheka sub watershed southern ethiopia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9295650
work_keys_str_mv AT tamratsinore effectsofsoilandwaterconservationatdifferentlandscapepositionsonsoilpropertiesandfarmersperceptioninhobichekasubwatershedsouthernethiopia
AT dinsadoboch effectsofsoilandwaterconservationatdifferentlandscapepositionsonsoilpropertiesandfarmersperceptioninhobichekasubwatershedsouthernethiopia