Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions

The rapid pace of urbanization has intensified conflicts between ecological conservation and the exploitation of natural resources, necessitating a renewed focus on balancing environmental protection with resource utilization. The integration of ecological protection and recreational functions into...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Cao, Kaiping Wang, Xinyao Zhao, Yunlu Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24014833
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576570481442816
author Lei Cao
Kaiping Wang
Xinyao Zhao
Yunlu Zhang
author_facet Lei Cao
Kaiping Wang
Xinyao Zhao
Yunlu Zhang
author_sort Lei Cao
collection DOAJ
description The rapid pace of urbanization has intensified conflicts between ecological conservation and the exploitation of natural resources, necessitating a renewed focus on balancing environmental protection with resource utilization. The integration of ecological protection and recreational functions into a composite ecological network offers a viable solution to address environmental challenges, enhance ecosystem service capacity, promote leisure and recreational activities, and stimulate regional economic development. Shallow mountainous regions, where urban–rural disparities and the overlap of natural habitats with human activities are pronounced, present critical areas of study. This research focuses on the shallow mountainous areas of Beijing, employing a combination of multivariate models, including ecological risk assessment (ERA), ecosystem service function evaluation, and recreational resource evaluation. The study also incorporates multivariate analytical methods such as recreational function evaluation, cold and hotspot analysis, and circuit theory to identify comprehensive source areas that simultaneously support ecological protection and recreation. By constructing composite corridors that facilitate both wildlife migration and human recreation, this study establishes a multifunctional ecological network. Key findings include: (1) The study identified 49 ecological source sites and 43 recreational source sites, along with 105 ecological corridors and 80 recreational corridors; (2) This research selected 54 ecological pinch points, 137 intersections between ecological and recreational corridors, and 283 alternative composite source points combining ecological and recreational resources; (3) This paper selected 140 composite source points and the construction of 128 composite corridors, 161 potential corridors, 371.82 km2 of risk prevention area, and 468.74 km2 of ecological protection area; (4) Network analysis revealed that the composite ecological network demonstrated superior closure, complexity, and connectivity compared to traditional methods; (5) This study proposed an optimization strategy for ecological spatial networks, based on the “patch-corridor-substrate” theory of landscape ecology, emphasizing 3 levels: ecological restoration, ecological protection, and the development of recreational systems. The multifunctional composite ecological network constructed in this study effectively mitigates ecological risks, enhances ecosystem services functions, and promotes the balanced integration of ecological conservation and sustainable economic activities, such as ecotourism and cultural heritage utilization. It provides a theoretical foundation and technical support for the coordinated optimization of ecological conservation and economic development in shallow mountainous regions globally.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb5d0d099a31481d9061f624abbef1e8
institution Kabale University
issn 1470-160X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj-art-bb5d0d099a31481d9061f624abbef1e82025-01-31T05:10:33ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2025-01-01170113026Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regionsLei Cao0Kaiping Wang1Xinyao Zhao2Yunlu Zhang3School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, PR ChinaSchool of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, PR ChinaSchool of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, PR ChinaCorresponding author.; School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, PR ChinaThe rapid pace of urbanization has intensified conflicts between ecological conservation and the exploitation of natural resources, necessitating a renewed focus on balancing environmental protection with resource utilization. The integration of ecological protection and recreational functions into a composite ecological network offers a viable solution to address environmental challenges, enhance ecosystem service capacity, promote leisure and recreational activities, and stimulate regional economic development. Shallow mountainous regions, where urban–rural disparities and the overlap of natural habitats with human activities are pronounced, present critical areas of study. This research focuses on the shallow mountainous areas of Beijing, employing a combination of multivariate models, including ecological risk assessment (ERA), ecosystem service function evaluation, and recreational resource evaluation. The study also incorporates multivariate analytical methods such as recreational function evaluation, cold and hotspot analysis, and circuit theory to identify comprehensive source areas that simultaneously support ecological protection and recreation. By constructing composite corridors that facilitate both wildlife migration and human recreation, this study establishes a multifunctional ecological network. Key findings include: (1) The study identified 49 ecological source sites and 43 recreational source sites, along with 105 ecological corridors and 80 recreational corridors; (2) This research selected 54 ecological pinch points, 137 intersections between ecological and recreational corridors, and 283 alternative composite source points combining ecological and recreational resources; (3) This paper selected 140 composite source points and the construction of 128 composite corridors, 161 potential corridors, 371.82 km2 of risk prevention area, and 468.74 km2 of ecological protection area; (4) Network analysis revealed that the composite ecological network demonstrated superior closure, complexity, and connectivity compared to traditional methods; (5) This study proposed an optimization strategy for ecological spatial networks, based on the “patch-corridor-substrate” theory of landscape ecology, emphasizing 3 levels: ecological restoration, ecological protection, and the development of recreational systems. The multifunctional composite ecological network constructed in this study effectively mitigates ecological risks, enhances ecosystem services functions, and promotes the balanced integration of ecological conservation and sustainable economic activities, such as ecotourism and cultural heritage utilization. It provides a theoretical foundation and technical support for the coordinated optimization of ecological conservation and economic development in shallow mountainous regions globally.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24014833Ecological risk managementEcological protectionRecreational utilizationComposite ecological networksShallow mountain regions
spellingShingle Lei Cao
Kaiping Wang
Xinyao Zhao
Yunlu Zhang
Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions
Ecological Indicators
Ecological risk management
Ecological protection
Recreational utilization
Composite ecological networks
Shallow mountain regions
title Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions
title_full Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions
title_fullStr Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions
title_short Optimizing composite ecological networks through Synergistic risk Management, ecological Conservation, and recreational Integration: A case study of Beijing’s shallow mountain regions
title_sort optimizing composite ecological networks through synergistic risk management ecological conservation and recreational integration a case study of beijing s shallow mountain regions
topic Ecological risk management
Ecological protection
Recreational utilization
Composite ecological networks
Shallow mountain regions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24014833
work_keys_str_mv AT leicao optimizingcompositeecologicalnetworksthroughsynergisticriskmanagementecologicalconservationandrecreationalintegrationacasestudyofbeijingsshallowmountainregions
AT kaipingwang optimizingcompositeecologicalnetworksthroughsynergisticriskmanagementecologicalconservationandrecreationalintegrationacasestudyofbeijingsshallowmountainregions
AT xinyaozhao optimizingcompositeecologicalnetworksthroughsynergisticriskmanagementecologicalconservationandrecreationalintegrationacasestudyofbeijingsshallowmountainregions
AT yunluzhang optimizingcompositeecologicalnetworksthroughsynergisticriskmanagementecologicalconservationandrecreationalintegrationacasestudyofbeijingsshallowmountainregions