Descartes, God, eternal truths, Creation Doctrine, modality, indifference, omnipotence, essence, arithmetic, Aquinas, Adrian W. Moore.
This paper offers a brief response to Patterson’s paper, ”Descartes on Modality and the Eternal Truths”, which itself is at least in part a response to Moore’s paper, ‘What Descartes ought to have thought about morality”. After reviewing some relevant points from both Patterson’s and Moore’s pape...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
he Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian Research Centre (University of Keele)
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Public Reason |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://publicreason.ro/pdfa/159 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper offers a brief response to Patterson’s paper, ”Descartes on Modality
and the Eternal Truths”, which itself is at least in part a response to Moore’s paper, ‘What
Descartes ought to have thought about morality”. After reviewing some relevant points
from both Patterson’s and Moore’s papers regarding the question of the divine creation of
necessary truths, I focus on the possible consequences of Descartes’ understanding of divine
simplicity for this interpretive debate. I argue that, by bearing Descartes’ commitment to
a strong form of divine simplicity in mind, we can see how he can both be committed to a
voluntaristic account of the creation of divine truths and yet indicate that God could not
have created things in another way. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2065-7285 2065-8958 |