Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects>50% of the world’s population, leading to gastric cancer if left untreated. An estimated 26,000 gastric cancer cases will occur in the US in 2023, with 40% of cases becoming the primary cause of death. Invasive and noninvasive techniques are used to diagnos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen Hill, Aiden V. Ohning, Jonathan P. Mallory, Stella Self, Christine M. G. Schammel, Jenny Meredith, John Reddic, Patrick Kent, Jenny B. Knight
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Advanced Gut & Microbiome Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2749199
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547315182731264
author Kathleen Hill
Aiden V. Ohning
Jonathan P. Mallory
Stella Self
Christine M. G. Schammel
Jenny Meredith
John Reddic
Patrick Kent
Jenny B. Knight
author_facet Kathleen Hill
Aiden V. Ohning
Jonathan P. Mallory
Stella Self
Christine M. G. Schammel
Jenny Meredith
John Reddic
Patrick Kent
Jenny B. Knight
author_sort Kathleen Hill
collection DOAJ
description Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects>50% of the world’s population, leading to gastric cancer if left untreated. An estimated 26,000 gastric cancer cases will occur in the US in 2023, with 40% of cases becoming the primary cause of death. Invasive and noninvasive techniques are used to diagnose H. pylori infection; however, controversy exists regarding the “gold standard” for diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of H. pylori invasive detection methods: stained biopsy and rapid urease test (RUT) at a single institution. For the study, 200 patients (100 H. pylori + and 100 H. pylori -) from a single institution that underwent gastric biopsies were selected and retrospectively evaluated for H. pylori status. Demographics and clinicopathologic data were collected, including diagnostic tests performed, treatment, and outcomes. Histology and RUT were highly positively and negatively correlative; however, disparate results occurred in 7% of samples which was significant (p<0.001). Of those that were H. pylori positive, 60% had a posttreatment test completed. Gastric cancer developed in 3 patients (1.5%), all of whom were H. pylori positive. Histology and RUT testing yield similar results; therefore, there is no efficacious reason to run both tests on patients. Since histology has greater sensitivity (>95%) and the ability to identify other gastropathies, it should be considered the “gold standard,” for the identification of H. pylori.
format Article
id doaj-art-bb052d8c0d08400695604726a34b6d68
institution Kabale University
issn 2755-1652
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advanced Gut & Microbiome Research
spelling doaj-art-bb052d8c0d08400695604726a34b6d682025-02-03T06:45:22ZengWileyAdvanced Gut & Microbiome Research2755-16522023-01-01202310.1155/2023/2749199Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single InstitutionKathleen Hill0Aiden V. Ohning1Jonathan P. Mallory2Stella Self3Christine M. G. Schammel4Jenny Meredith5John Reddic6Patrick Kent7Jenny B. Knight8University of South Carolina School of Medicine GreenvilleKenyon CollegeClemson UniversityDepartment of EpidemiologyDepartment of PathologyClinical MicrobiologyClinical ChemistryDepartment of Infectious DiseaseUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine GreenvilleHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects>50% of the world’s population, leading to gastric cancer if left untreated. An estimated 26,000 gastric cancer cases will occur in the US in 2023, with 40% of cases becoming the primary cause of death. Invasive and noninvasive techniques are used to diagnose H. pylori infection; however, controversy exists regarding the “gold standard” for diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of H. pylori invasive detection methods: stained biopsy and rapid urease test (RUT) at a single institution. For the study, 200 patients (100 H. pylori + and 100 H. pylori -) from a single institution that underwent gastric biopsies were selected and retrospectively evaluated for H. pylori status. Demographics and clinicopathologic data were collected, including diagnostic tests performed, treatment, and outcomes. Histology and RUT were highly positively and negatively correlative; however, disparate results occurred in 7% of samples which was significant (p<0.001). Of those that were H. pylori positive, 60% had a posttreatment test completed. Gastric cancer developed in 3 patients (1.5%), all of whom were H. pylori positive. Histology and RUT testing yield similar results; therefore, there is no efficacious reason to run both tests on patients. Since histology has greater sensitivity (>95%) and the ability to identify other gastropathies, it should be considered the “gold standard,” for the identification of H. pylori.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2749199
spellingShingle Kathleen Hill
Aiden V. Ohning
Jonathan P. Mallory
Stella Self
Christine M. G. Schammel
Jenny Meredith
John Reddic
Patrick Kent
Jenny B. Knight
Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution
Advanced Gut & Microbiome Research
title Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution
title_full Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution
title_fullStr Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution
title_short Comparing Efficacies of Biopsy and Rapid Urease Testing for H. Pylori at a Single Institution
title_sort comparing efficacies of biopsy and rapid urease testing for h pylori at a single institution
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2749199
work_keys_str_mv AT kathleenhill comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT aidenvohning comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT jonathanpmallory comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT stellaself comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT christinemgschammel comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT jennymeredith comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT johnreddic comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT patrickkent comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution
AT jennybknight comparingefficaciesofbiopsyandrapidureasetestingforhpyloriatasingleinstitution