Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors

Longitudinal data for studying urinary incontinence (UI) risk factors are rare. Data from one study, the hallmark Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA), have been analyzed in the past; however, repeated measures analyses that are crucial for analyzing longitudinal data have no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Theophilus O. Ogunyemi, Mohammad-Reza Siadat, Suzan Arslanturk, Kim A. Killinger, Ananias C. Diokno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/276501
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564219840561152
author Theophilus O. Ogunyemi
Mohammad-Reza Siadat
Suzan Arslanturk
Kim A. Killinger
Ananias C. Diokno
author_facet Theophilus O. Ogunyemi
Mohammad-Reza Siadat
Suzan Arslanturk
Kim A. Killinger
Ananias C. Diokno
author_sort Theophilus O. Ogunyemi
collection DOAJ
description Longitudinal data for studying urinary incontinence (UI) risk factors are rare. Data from one study, the hallmark Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA), have been analyzed in the past; however, repeated measures analyses that are crucial for analyzing longitudinal data have not been applied. We tested a novel application of statistical methods to identify UI risk factors in older women. MESA data were collected at baseline and yearly from a sample of 1955 men and women in the community. Only women responding to the 762 baseline and 559 follow-up questions at one year in each respective survey were examined. To test their utility in mining large data sets, and as a preliminary step to creating a predictive index for developing UI, logistic regression, generalized estimating equations (GEEs), and proportional hazard regression (PHREG) methods were used on the existing MESA data. The GEE and PHREG combination identified 15 significant risk factors associated with developing UI out of which six of them, namely, urinary frequency, urgency, any urine loss, urine loss after emptying, subject’s anticipation, and doctor’s proactivity, are found most highly significant by both methods. These six factors are potential candidates for constructing a future UI predictive index.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba5bf2214226474391b2de4fc5fc809e
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6369
1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-ba5bf2214226474391b2de4fc5fc809e2025-02-03T01:11:38ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63691687-63772012-01-01201210.1155/2012/276501276501Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk FactorsTheophilus O. Ogunyemi0Mohammad-Reza Siadat1Suzan Arslanturk2Kim A. Killinger3Ananias C. Diokno4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Oakland University, 2200 N. Squirrel Road, Rochester, MI 48309, USADepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USADepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USABeaumont Health System, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USABeaumont Health System, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USALongitudinal data for studying urinary incontinence (UI) risk factors are rare. Data from one study, the hallmark Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA), have been analyzed in the past; however, repeated measures analyses that are crucial for analyzing longitudinal data have not been applied. We tested a novel application of statistical methods to identify UI risk factors in older women. MESA data were collected at baseline and yearly from a sample of 1955 men and women in the community. Only women responding to the 762 baseline and 559 follow-up questions at one year in each respective survey were examined. To test their utility in mining large data sets, and as a preliminary step to creating a predictive index for developing UI, logistic regression, generalized estimating equations (GEEs), and proportional hazard regression (PHREG) methods were used on the existing MESA data. The GEE and PHREG combination identified 15 significant risk factors associated with developing UI out of which six of them, namely, urinary frequency, urgency, any urine loss, urine loss after emptying, subject’s anticipation, and doctor’s proactivity, are found most highly significant by both methods. These six factors are potential candidates for constructing a future UI predictive index.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/276501
spellingShingle Theophilus O. Ogunyemi
Mohammad-Reza Siadat
Suzan Arslanturk
Kim A. Killinger
Ananias C. Diokno
Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors
Advances in Urology
title Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors
title_full Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors
title_fullStr Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors
title_full_unstemmed Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors
title_short Novel Application of Statistical Methods to Identify New Urinary Incontinence Risk Factors
title_sort novel application of statistical methods to identify new urinary incontinence risk factors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/276501
work_keys_str_mv AT theophilusoogunyemi novelapplicationofstatisticalmethodstoidentifynewurinaryincontinenceriskfactors
AT mohammadrezasiadat novelapplicationofstatisticalmethodstoidentifynewurinaryincontinenceriskfactors
AT suzanarslanturk novelapplicationofstatisticalmethodstoidentifynewurinaryincontinenceriskfactors
AT kimakillinger novelapplicationofstatisticalmethodstoidentifynewurinaryincontinenceriskfactors
AT ananiascdiokno novelapplicationofstatisticalmethodstoidentifynewurinaryincontinenceriskfactors