The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation

Foresight researchers, like other professional communities, are evolving to more sophisticated theories and practices that address complex problems at new levels, requiring a holistic view of complex social, economic, technological and environmental systems. There is an emerging need to understand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcus Anthony
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics 2024-09-01
Series:Foresight and STI Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/22529
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850151910019956736
author Marcus Anthony
author_facet Marcus Anthony
author_sort Marcus Anthony
collection DOAJ
description Foresight researchers, like other professional communities, are evolving to more sophisticated theories and practices that address complex problems at new levels, requiring a holistic view of complex social, economic, technological and environmental systems. There is an emerging need to understand the nature of complex systems in order to develop appropriate thinking beyond established notions of the nature of capabilities. The heterogeneous ability to absorb new knowledge has led to the emergence in Foresight research circles of a philosophical division between a relatively narrow (in the logic of corporate strategies) and a more holistic, transformative view of the future. The article assesses the extent of this division and the dynamics of its change through a sample analysis of the practices of the world's leading Foresight centers. An overview of their philosophies, concepts and practices is presented, and the degree of readiness for a systemic approach through the prism of the five dimensions of Foresight is assessed.  The study reveals a not so obvious trend - many centers understand the value and effectiveness of systems theory for solving contemporary problems in an increasingly complex context and are introducing “systemic” into their philosophy. However, there are difficulties in synthesizing the rational and irrational aspects in strategic thinking that are embedded in historical and cognitive dimensions. Overcoming this cognitive dichotomy allows Foresight practitioners to “see the future far, deep and inclusive in its wholeness”, and gain a more accurate picture of what is coming and how to prepare for it proactively.
format Article
id doaj-art-b9a2b3d903ba46ae856d2bdb0318c8f5
institution OA Journals
issn 2500-2597
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher National Research University Higher School of Economics
record_format Article
series Foresight and STI Governance
spelling doaj-art-b9a2b3d903ba46ae856d2bdb0318c8f52025-08-20T02:26:06ZengNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsForesight and STI Governance2500-25972024-09-0118310.17323/2500-2597.2024.3.41.53The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational OrientationMarcus Anthony0Beijing Institute of Technology in Zhuhai Foresight researchers, like other professional communities, are evolving to more sophisticated theories and practices that address complex problems at new levels, requiring a holistic view of complex social, economic, technological and environmental systems. There is an emerging need to understand the nature of complex systems in order to develop appropriate thinking beyond established notions of the nature of capabilities. The heterogeneous ability to absorb new knowledge has led to the emergence in Foresight research circles of a philosophical division between a relatively narrow (in the logic of corporate strategies) and a more holistic, transformative view of the future. The article assesses the extent of this division and the dynamics of its change through a sample analysis of the practices of the world's leading Foresight centers. An overview of their philosophies, concepts and practices is presented, and the degree of readiness for a systemic approach through the prism of the five dimensions of Foresight is assessed.  The study reveals a not so obvious trend - many centers understand the value and effectiveness of systems theory for solving contemporary problems in an increasingly complex context and are introducing “systemic” into their philosophy. However, there are difficulties in synthesizing the rational and irrational aspects in strategic thinking that are embedded in historical and cognitive dimensions. Overcoming this cognitive dichotomy allows Foresight practitioners to “see the future far, deep and inclusive in its wholeness”, and gain a more accurate picture of what is coming and how to prepare for it proactively. https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/22529history of strategic planning sciencetransformationForesightfutures studiesmethodsways of knowing
spellingShingle Marcus Anthony
The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation
Foresight and STI Governance
history of strategic planning science
transformation
Foresight
futures studies
methods
ways of knowing
title The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation
title_full The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation
title_fullStr The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation
title_full_unstemmed The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation
title_short The Landscape of Foresight Theory and Practice: Between Strategic and Transformational Orientation
title_sort landscape of foresight theory and practice between strategic and transformational orientation
topic history of strategic planning science
transformation
Foresight
futures studies
methods
ways of knowing
url https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/22529
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusanthony thelandscapeofforesighttheoryandpracticebetweenstrategicandtransformationalorientation
AT marcusanthony landscapeofforesighttheoryandpracticebetweenstrategicandtransformationalorientation