Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking

The article is devoted to engineering and pedagogical thinking as a kind of professional thinking that exists due to specific reasons and necessary and sufficient conditions. The “assembly” of these causes and conditions takes place in a certain time-and-place (chronotope), the conceptual reconstruc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. V. Feoktistov, A. G. Kislov, I. V. Shapko, V. E. Gorodilov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University 2023-07-01
Series:Высшее образование в России
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4498
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574469742264320
author A. V. Feoktistov
A. G. Kislov
I. V. Shapko
V. E. Gorodilov
author_facet A. V. Feoktistov
A. G. Kislov
I. V. Shapko
V. E. Gorodilov
author_sort A. V. Feoktistov
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to engineering and pedagogical thinking as a kind of professional thinking that exists due to specific reasons and necessary and sufficient conditions. The “assembly” of these causes and conditions takes place in a certain time-and-place (chronotope), the conceptual reconstruction of which opens the way to overcoming the traditions of haphazard enumerative descriptions of various properties that have developed in the literature and to reaching the construction of the theory of engineering and pedagogical thinking, which, in turn, will help to reasonably update the content and organization of training engineers-teachers, on whom a lot depends in the near technological future of Russia. A review of the characteristics of engineering-pedagogical and related engineering and pedagogical thinking presented in scientific publications is proposed. It shows the need for greater certainty in understanding the nature, foundations, essence and features of heterogeneous engineering and pedagogical thinking. Heterogeneity requires actualization of the potential not only of pedagogy and technical sciences, but also of philosophy, cultural studies, sociology, and psychology. Such actualization shows the heuristic of the communicative interpretation of the nature and essence of thinking. In its light, engineering-pedagogical thinking appears simultaneously as an articulated and unarticulated, discrete and continuous communication of engineers-teachers with students, within which the competencies required by the profession and the impulse developing engineering and technical flair and ingenuity are transmitted, “infecting” (V. Shklovsky2) and charging them, thanks to which communication overcomes the boundaries of the chronotope, gaining continuum features, demonstrating its pulsating situational-suprasituative (corpuscular-wave) dualism. The scientific novelty lies in the justification, by the example of advancing to the theory of engineering and pedagogical thinking, of supplementing the competence approach with consideration of no less significant cultural and subcultural factors, including latent ones, which sometimes manifest themselves in very weak signals about the features of the chronotope of training engineers and technicians by engineers–teachers, not so much by virtue of official regulations as by virtue of singular acts of everyday life communication.
format Article
id doaj-art-b914f1c3eb594be79d27da0074cea30b
institution Kabale University
issn 0869-3617
2072-0459
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Moscow Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Высшее образование в России
spelling doaj-art-b914f1c3eb594be79d27da0074cea30b2025-02-01T13:14:31ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592023-07-0132713515610.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-7-135-1562403Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical ThinkingA. V. Feoktistov0A. G. Kislov1I. V. Shapko2V. E. Gorodilov3Russian State Vocational Pedagogical UniversityRussian State Vocational Pedagogical UniversityUral State Pedagogical University YekaterinburgState Vocational Pedagogical UniversityThe article is devoted to engineering and pedagogical thinking as a kind of professional thinking that exists due to specific reasons and necessary and sufficient conditions. The “assembly” of these causes and conditions takes place in a certain time-and-place (chronotope), the conceptual reconstruction of which opens the way to overcoming the traditions of haphazard enumerative descriptions of various properties that have developed in the literature and to reaching the construction of the theory of engineering and pedagogical thinking, which, in turn, will help to reasonably update the content and organization of training engineers-teachers, on whom a lot depends in the near technological future of Russia. A review of the characteristics of engineering-pedagogical and related engineering and pedagogical thinking presented in scientific publications is proposed. It shows the need for greater certainty in understanding the nature, foundations, essence and features of heterogeneous engineering and pedagogical thinking. Heterogeneity requires actualization of the potential not only of pedagogy and technical sciences, but also of philosophy, cultural studies, sociology, and psychology. Such actualization shows the heuristic of the communicative interpretation of the nature and essence of thinking. In its light, engineering-pedagogical thinking appears simultaneously as an articulated and unarticulated, discrete and continuous communication of engineers-teachers with students, within which the competencies required by the profession and the impulse developing engineering and technical flair and ingenuity are transmitted, “infecting” (V. Shklovsky2) and charging them, thanks to which communication overcomes the boundaries of the chronotope, gaining continuum features, demonstrating its pulsating situational-suprasituative (corpuscular-wave) dualism. The scientific novelty lies in the justification, by the example of advancing to the theory of engineering and pedagogical thinking, of supplementing the competence approach with consideration of no less significant cultural and subcultural factors, including latent ones, which sometimes manifest themselves in very weak signals about the features of the chronotope of training engineers and technicians by engineers–teachers, not so much by virtue of official regulations as by virtue of singular acts of everyday life communication.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4498culturesubculturethinkingprofessional cultureprofessional thinkingengineering and technical cultureengineering and technical thinkingpedagogical culturepedagogical thinkingengineering and pedagogical subcultureengineering and pedagogical thinking
spellingShingle A. V. Feoktistov
A. G. Kislov
I. V. Shapko
V. E. Gorodilov
Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking
Высшее образование в России
culture
subculture
thinking
professional culture
professional thinking
engineering and technical culture
engineering and technical thinking
pedagogical culture
pedagogical thinking
engineering and pedagogical subculture
engineering and pedagogical thinking
title Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking
title_full Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking
title_fullStr Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking
title_full_unstemmed Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking
title_short Chronotope of Engineering and Pedagogical Thinking
title_sort chronotope of engineering and pedagogical thinking
topic culture
subculture
thinking
professional culture
professional thinking
engineering and technical culture
engineering and technical thinking
pedagogical culture
pedagogical thinking
engineering and pedagogical subculture
engineering and pedagogical thinking
url https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4498
work_keys_str_mv AT avfeoktistov chronotopeofengineeringandpedagogicalthinking
AT agkislov chronotopeofengineeringandpedagogicalthinking
AT ivshapko chronotopeofengineeringandpedagogicalthinking
AT vegorodilov chronotopeofengineeringandpedagogicalthinking