Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques

Two low power‐delay‐product (PDP) dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques are proposed. The techniques can simply modify existing dynamic CMOS designs to improve dynamic circuit delay and PDP. Conventional benchmark circuits and the modified circuits using the proposed techniques are implemented in 9...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Xue, S. Ren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-03-01
Series:Electronics Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2016.4173
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832096697922093056
author H. Xue
S. Ren
author_facet H. Xue
S. Ren
author_sort H. Xue
collection DOAJ
description Two low power‐delay‐product (PDP) dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques are proposed. The techniques can simply modify existing dynamic CMOS designs to improve dynamic circuit delay and PDP. Conventional benchmark circuits and the modified circuits using the proposed techniques are implemented in 90 nm CMOS technology with a 1.2 V power supply. Simulation results indicate that the proposed techniques can improve circuit PDP by 19.2 and 61.9% in two non‐inverted dynamic benchmarks, respectively, and 6.2 and 33.72% in two inverted dynamic benchmarks, respectively.
format Article
id doaj-art-b8ff1d05cef4415fa1cecb8e6ed7bd36
institution Kabale University
issn 0013-5194
1350-911X
language English
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Electronics Letters
spelling doaj-art-b8ff1d05cef4415fa1cecb8e6ed7bd362025-02-05T12:30:42ZengWileyElectronics Letters0013-51941350-911X2017-03-0153530230410.1049/el.2016.4173Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniquesH. Xue0S. Ren1Wright State UniversityDaytonOH45435USAWright State UniversityDaytonOH45435USATwo low power‐delay‐product (PDP) dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques are proposed. The techniques can simply modify existing dynamic CMOS designs to improve dynamic circuit delay and PDP. Conventional benchmark circuits and the modified circuits using the proposed techniques are implemented in 90 nm CMOS technology with a 1.2 V power supply. Simulation results indicate that the proposed techniques can improve circuit PDP by 19.2 and 61.9% in two non‐inverted dynamic benchmarks, respectively, and 6.2 and 33.72% in two inverted dynamic benchmarks, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2016.4173PDP dynamic CMOS circuit design techniqueslow power‐delay‐product circuit design techniquesdynamic circuit delay improvementnon‐inverted dynamic benchmarksinverted dynamic benchmarksvoltage 1.2 V
spellingShingle H. Xue
S. Ren
Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
Electronics Letters
PDP dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
low power‐delay‐product circuit design techniques
dynamic circuit delay improvement
non‐inverted dynamic benchmarks
inverted dynamic benchmarks
voltage 1.2 V
title Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
title_full Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
title_fullStr Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
title_full_unstemmed Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
title_short Low power‐delay‐product dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
title_sort low power delay product dynamic cmos circuit design techniques
topic PDP dynamic CMOS circuit design techniques
low power‐delay‐product circuit design techniques
dynamic circuit delay improvement
non‐inverted dynamic benchmarks
inverted dynamic benchmarks
voltage 1.2 V
url https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2016.4173
work_keys_str_mv AT hxue lowpowerdelayproductdynamiccmoscircuitdesigntechniques
AT sren lowpowerdelayproductdynamiccmoscircuitdesigntechniques