James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology

In this paper I show that James Africanus Beale Horton launched an internal critique of race science as it developed in the hands of Robert Knox, Carl Vogt, and James Hunt. The latter three held an inductivist Baconian conception of science. Horton shows that their practices as scientists and natura...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zeyad El Nabolsy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aperio 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Modern Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmphil.org/article/id/2501/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575966984011776
author Zeyad El Nabolsy
author_facet Zeyad El Nabolsy
author_sort Zeyad El Nabolsy
collection DOAJ
description In this paper I show that James Africanus Beale Horton launched an internal critique of race science as it developed in the hands of Robert Knox, Carl Vogt, and James Hunt. The latter three held an inductivist Baconian conception of science. Horton shows that their practices as scientists and natural philosophers contradict their own conception of what one must do in order to do good science. Horton’s critique of race science has important implications for philosophical anthropology as it took shape over the course of the nineteenth century and for our understanding of the history of African philosophy in its global context.
format Article
id doaj-art-b8fc14eb7c1a4416acbbc63678a6aa32
institution Kabale University
issn 2644-0652
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Aperio
record_format Article
series Journal of Modern Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-b8fc14eb7c1a4416acbbc63678a6aa322025-01-31T16:08:53ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522025-01-016210.25894/jmp.2501James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical AnthropologyZeyad El Nabolsy0Philosophy, York UniversityIn this paper I show that James Africanus Beale Horton launched an internal critique of race science as it developed in the hands of Robert Knox, Carl Vogt, and James Hunt. The latter three held an inductivist Baconian conception of science. Horton shows that their practices as scientists and natural philosophers contradict their own conception of what one must do in order to do good science. Horton’s critique of race science has important implications for philosophical anthropology as it took shape over the course of the nineteenth century and for our understanding of the history of African philosophy in its global context.https://jmphil.org/article/id/2501/James Africanus Beale HortonCarl VogtRobert KnoxJames HuntPhilosophy of RaceFrancis Bacon
spellingShingle Zeyad El Nabolsy
James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology
Journal of Modern Philosophy
James Africanus Beale Horton
Carl Vogt
Robert Knox
James Hunt
Philosophy of Race
Francis Bacon
title James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology
title_full James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology
title_fullStr James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology
title_full_unstemmed James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology
title_short James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology
title_sort james africanus beale horton on naturalism baconianism and race science in victorian philosophical anthropology
topic James Africanus Beale Horton
Carl Vogt
Robert Knox
James Hunt
Philosophy of Race
Francis Bacon
url https://jmphil.org/article/id/2501/
work_keys_str_mv AT zeyadelnabolsy jamesafricanusbealehortononnaturalismbaconianismandracescienceinvictorianphilosophicalanthropology