Nutritional and Microbiome Effects of a Partial Substitution of Poultry Meat with Hydrolyzed Feather Meal in Dog Diets
Two extruded diets isoenergetic, isonitrogenous, and isolipidic were formulated with poultry meal (control diet) as the source of animal-origin proteins (160 g/kg of feed) or with 90 g/kg of poultry meal and 70 g/kg of hydrolyzed feather meal (treated diet) and were fed to eight dogs (four adult fem...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Microorganisms |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/1/121 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Two extruded diets isoenergetic, isonitrogenous, and isolipidic were formulated with poultry meal (control diet) as the source of animal-origin proteins (160 g/kg of feed) or with 90 g/kg of poultry meal and 70 g/kg of hydrolyzed feather meal (treated diet) and were fed to eight dogs (four adult female and four adult male English Setters). Body condition, muscle condition, and fecal consistency scores and body weight were monitored at the beginning of the trial and after 3, 7, 15, and 45 days, and no significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were observed between diets and between sex. Fecal samples, collected at the same time points, were analyzed for microbiota composition. No significant difference was calculated for the alpha diversity index between control diet and treated diet, nor for the diets × times of sampling interaction and for sex. Beta diversity was different (<i>p</i>-value 0.001) between the control and treated groups. The beta diversity between sexes was significantly different (<i>p</i>-value = 0.047). Linear Discriminant analysis effect size analysis revealed significant differences between dietary groups, identifying <i>Clostridiales</i>, <i>Coprococcus</i>, <i>Bacteroides plebeius</i>, <i>Eubacterium biforme</i>, <i>Catenibacterium</i>, and <i>Prevotella copri</i> as more abundant in the CTR diet, while <i>Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, Fusobacteriaceae</i>, <i>Paraprevotellaceae, Enterococcus</i>, <i>Faecalibacterium</i>, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, <i>Peptostreptococcaceae</i>, and <i>Clostridium spiroforme</i> were more abundant in the treated diet. Sex differences were also significant, with 25 taxa differing between male and female dogs. Overall, the study underscores the impact of HFM and sex on gut microbiota composition in dogs, with potential implications for dietary interventions and microbiome research. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-2607 |