Stability of generalized cubic- and quartic-type functional equations in the setting of non-Archimedean spaces
In the field of functional equations and their solutions, Ulam's stability is an essential concept. This theory examines whether the function approximating a certain functional equation is close to the function that exactly satisfies it. A broader extension of the stability concept is generaliz...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Taibah University for Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/16583655.2025.2474846 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In the field of functional equations and their solutions, Ulam's stability is an essential concept. This theory examines whether the function approximating a certain functional equation is close to the function that exactly satisfies it. A broader extension of the stability concept is generalized Hyers–Ulam stability. Classifying, analysing and solving functional equations across multiple spaces are made easier by using this. In this investigation, we examine the generalized Hyers–Ulam stability of generalized cubic- and quartic-type functional equations of the form: [Figure: see text]m{f(mϑ+μ)+f(mϑ−μ)}+f(ϑ+mμ)+f(ϑ−mμ)=2m2{f(ϑ+μ)+f(ϑ−μ)}+2(m4−2m2+1)f(ϑ) and [Figure: see text]f(mϑ+μ)+f(mϑ−μ)+f(ϑ+mμ)+f(ϑ−mμ)=2m2+{f(ϑ+μ)+f(ϑ−μ)}+2(m4−2m2+1){f(ϑ)+f(μ)}, in setting of non-Archimedean (n-A) normed spaces by using distinguished Hyers direct method. Also, we provide a graphical representation of an approximate solution and how it differs from an exact solution for both equations. Furthermore, we present counterexamples that demonstrate the failure case of stability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1658-3655 |