Systematic comparison of Mendelian randomisation studies and randomised controlled trials using electronic databases
Objective To scope the potential for (semi)-automated triangulation of Mendelian randomisation (MR) and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evidence since the two methods have distinct assumptions that make comparisons between their results invaluable.Methods We mined ClinicalTrials.Gov, PubMed and...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jie Zheng, George Davey Smith, Tom R Gaunt, Maria K Sobczyk |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-09-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/9/e072087.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Mendelian Randomisation Study of Childhood BMI and Early Menarche
by: Hannah S. Mumby, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Blinding assessment in randomised sham-controlled trials of acupuncture:protocol for a systematic survey
by: Ling Li, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Chinese Herbal Medicine for Weight Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials
by: Ann Rann Wong, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Modifiable factors for irritable bowel syndrome: evidence from Mendelian randomisation approach
by: Jinling Tang, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Understanding the educational inequalities in suicide attempts and their mediators: a Mendelian randomisation study
by: Jing Wang, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)