Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome

Abstract Metataxonomic studies have underpinned a vast understanding of microbial communities residing within livestock gastrointestinal tracts, albeit studies have often not been combined to provide a global census. Consequently, in this study we characterised the overall and common ‘core’ chicken...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: PB. Burrows, F. Godoy-Santos, K. Lawther, A. Richmond, N. Corcionivoschi, SA. Huws
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03690-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586011693023232
author PB. Burrows
F. Godoy-Santos
K. Lawther
A. Richmond
N. Corcionivoschi
SA. Huws
author_facet PB. Burrows
F. Godoy-Santos
K. Lawther
A. Richmond
N. Corcionivoschi
SA. Huws
author_sort PB. Burrows
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Metataxonomic studies have underpinned a vast understanding of microbial communities residing within livestock gastrointestinal tracts, albeit studies have often not been combined to provide a global census. Consequently, in this study we characterised the overall and common ‘core’ chicken microbiota associated with the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), whilst assessing the effects of GIT site, bird breed, age and geographical location on the GIT resident microbes using metataxonomic data compiled from studies completed across the world. Specifically, bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences from GIT samples associated with various breeds, differing in age, GIT sites (caecum, faeces, ileum and jejunum) and geographical location were obtained from the Sequence Read Archive and analysed using the MGnify pipeline. Metataxonomic profiles produced across the 602 datasets illustrated the presence of 3 phyla, 25 families and 30 genera, of which core genera (defined by presence in over 90% of datasets) belonged to Lactobacillus, Faecalibacterium, Butyricicoccus, Eisenbergiella, Subdoligranulum, Oscillibacter, Clostridium & Blautia. PERMANOVA analysis also showed that GIT site, bird breed, age and geographical location all had a significant effect on GIT microbial diversity, regardless of dietary factors, which were not considered in this study. On a genus level, Faecalibacterium was most abundant in the caeca, Lactobacillus was most abundant in the faeces, ileum and jejunum, with the data showing that the caeca and faeces were most diverse. AIL F8 progeny, Ross 308 and Cobb 500 breeds GIT bacteria were dominated by Lactobacillus, and Eisenbergiella, Megamonas and Bacteroides were most abundant amongst Sasso-T451A and Tibetan chicken breeds. Microbial communities within each GIT site develop with age, from a Lactobacillus and Streptococcus dominated community during the earlier stages of growth, towards a Faecalibacterium, Eisenbergiella, Bacteroides, Megamonas, and Lactobacillus dominated community during the later stages of life. Geographical locations, and thus environmental effectors, also impacted upon gastrointestinal tract microbiota, with Canadian and European datasets being dominated by Lactobacillus, whilst UK and Chinese datasets were dominated by Eisenbergiella and Bacteroides respectively. This study aids in defining what ‘normal’ is within poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiota globally, which is imperative to enhancing the microbiome for productive and environmental improvements.
format Article
id doaj-art-b6a1ec7b932f4404af0eebc1a099ec6f
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2180
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-b6a1ec7b932f4404af0eebc1a099ec6f2025-01-26T12:17:51ZengBMCBMC Microbiology1471-21802025-01-0125111610.1186/s12866-024-03690-xDecoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiomePB. Burrows0F. Godoy-Santos1K. Lawther2A. Richmond3N. Corcionivoschi4SA. Huws5School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University BelfastMoy Park, Food ParkBacteriology Branch, Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences InstituteSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University BelfastAbstract Metataxonomic studies have underpinned a vast understanding of microbial communities residing within livestock gastrointestinal tracts, albeit studies have often not been combined to provide a global census. Consequently, in this study we characterised the overall and common ‘core’ chicken microbiota associated with the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), whilst assessing the effects of GIT site, bird breed, age and geographical location on the GIT resident microbes using metataxonomic data compiled from studies completed across the world. Specifically, bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences from GIT samples associated with various breeds, differing in age, GIT sites (caecum, faeces, ileum and jejunum) and geographical location were obtained from the Sequence Read Archive and analysed using the MGnify pipeline. Metataxonomic profiles produced across the 602 datasets illustrated the presence of 3 phyla, 25 families and 30 genera, of which core genera (defined by presence in over 90% of datasets) belonged to Lactobacillus, Faecalibacterium, Butyricicoccus, Eisenbergiella, Subdoligranulum, Oscillibacter, Clostridium & Blautia. PERMANOVA analysis also showed that GIT site, bird breed, age and geographical location all had a significant effect on GIT microbial diversity, regardless of dietary factors, which were not considered in this study. On a genus level, Faecalibacterium was most abundant in the caeca, Lactobacillus was most abundant in the faeces, ileum and jejunum, with the data showing that the caeca and faeces were most diverse. AIL F8 progeny, Ross 308 and Cobb 500 breeds GIT bacteria were dominated by Lactobacillus, and Eisenbergiella, Megamonas and Bacteroides were most abundant amongst Sasso-T451A and Tibetan chicken breeds. Microbial communities within each GIT site develop with age, from a Lactobacillus and Streptococcus dominated community during the earlier stages of growth, towards a Faecalibacterium, Eisenbergiella, Bacteroides, Megamonas, and Lactobacillus dominated community during the later stages of life. Geographical locations, and thus environmental effectors, also impacted upon gastrointestinal tract microbiota, with Canadian and European datasets being dominated by Lactobacillus, whilst UK and Chinese datasets were dominated by Eisenbergiella and Bacteroides respectively. This study aids in defining what ‘normal’ is within poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiota globally, which is imperative to enhancing the microbiome for productive and environmental improvements.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03690-xBroilerGIT sitesMicrobiota16S rRNA geneMetataxonomyGut
spellingShingle PB. Burrows
F. Godoy-Santos
K. Lawther
A. Richmond
N. Corcionivoschi
SA. Huws
Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
BMC Microbiology
Broiler
GIT sites
Microbiota
16S rRNA gene
Metataxonomy
Gut
title Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
title_full Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
title_fullStr Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
title_short Decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
title_sort decoding the chicken gastrointestinal microbiome
topic Broiler
GIT sites
Microbiota
16S rRNA gene
Metataxonomy
Gut
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03690-x
work_keys_str_mv AT pbburrows decodingthechickengastrointestinalmicrobiome
AT fgodoysantos decodingthechickengastrointestinalmicrobiome
AT klawther decodingthechickengastrointestinalmicrobiome
AT arichmond decodingthechickengastrointestinalmicrobiome
AT ncorcionivoschi decodingthechickengastrointestinalmicrobiome
AT sahuws decodingthechickengastrointestinalmicrobiome