Central Management of Research Misconduct in the USA and Canada
This paper proposes major changes in how research misconduct cases should be managed in the USA and Canada. Specifically, I advocate for centralized oversight that completely removes research institutions from this role in order to: mitigate institutional conflicts of interest, standardize definiti...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Jonathan J. Shuster |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Canadian Journal of Bioethics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/790 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Types of Research Articles and Research Misconduct: Book Review
by: Nipin Kalal, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Get the root of research misconduct: a systematic review of its cultural factors
by: Wei Feng, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
by: Serge P.J.M. Horbach, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Magnitude and Factors Associated with Research Misconduct at a Public University in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Habtamu Belay Hailu, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Using Grounded Theory to Avoid Research Misconduct in Management Science
by: Isabelle Walsh
Published: (2014-06-01)