Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study

Introduction Low-cost generic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are available in several low-income/middle-income countries, important for treatment scale-up. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of genotype-dependent and pan-genotypic DAA regimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyed Moayed Alavian, Mohammad Tasavon Gholamhoseini, Heidar Sharafi, Helena HL Borba, Asma Sabermahani, Behzad Hajarizadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e058757.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584089348079616
author Seyed Moayed Alavian
Mohammad Tasavon Gholamhoseini
Heidar Sharafi
Helena HL Borba
Asma Sabermahani
Behzad Hajarizadeh
author_facet Seyed Moayed Alavian
Mohammad Tasavon Gholamhoseini
Heidar Sharafi
Helena HL Borba
Asma Sabermahani
Behzad Hajarizadeh
author_sort Seyed Moayed Alavian
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Low-cost generic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are available in several low-income/middle-income countries, important for treatment scale-up. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of genotype-dependent and pan-genotypic DAA regimens in Iran as an example of a resource-limited setting.Methods A Markov model was developed to simulate HCV natural history. A decision tree was developed for HCV treatment, assuming four scenarios, including scenario 1: genotyping, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) for genotype 1, and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV) for genotype 3; scenario 2: genotyping, SOF/LDV for genotype 1, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for genotype 3; scenario 3: no genotyping and SOF/DCV for all; and scenario 4: no genotyping and SOF/VEL for all. A 1-year cycle length was used to calculate the cumulative cost and effectiveness over a lifetime time horizon. We calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using a health system perspective. Costs were converted to US dollars using purchasing power parity exchange rate ($PPP). All costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%.Results Among people with no cirrhosis, scenario 3 had the minimum cost, compared with which scenario 4 was cost-effective with an ICER of 4583 $PPP per QALY (willingness-to-pay threshold: 9,311 $PPP per QALY). Among both people with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, scenario 4 was cost saving. In sensitivity analysis, scenario 4 would be also cost-saving among people with no cirrhosis provided a 39% reduction in the cost of 12 weeks SOF/VEL.Conclusion Initiating all patients on pan-genotypic generic DAA regimens with no pretreatment genotyping was cost-effective compared with scenarios requiring pretreatment HCV genotype tests. Among generic pan-genotypic DAA regimens, SOF/VEL was cost-effective, for people with no cirrhosis and cost-saving for those with cirrhosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-b63067b4f98140f2ad32a158e9f3519f
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-b63067b4f98140f2ad32a158e9f3519f2025-01-27T18:05:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-06-0112610.1136/bmjopen-2021-058757Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness studySeyed Moayed Alavian0Mohammad Tasavon Gholamhoseini1Heidar Sharafi2Helena HL Borba3Asma Sabermahani4Behzad Hajarizadeh5Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gasteroenterology and Liver Disease, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranMiddle East Liver Diseases (MELD) Center, Tehran, IranDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilDepartment of Management, Health Policy and Health Economics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaIntroduction Low-cost generic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are available in several low-income/middle-income countries, important for treatment scale-up. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of genotype-dependent and pan-genotypic DAA regimens in Iran as an example of a resource-limited setting.Methods A Markov model was developed to simulate HCV natural history. A decision tree was developed for HCV treatment, assuming four scenarios, including scenario 1: genotyping, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) for genotype 1, and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV) for genotype 3; scenario 2: genotyping, SOF/LDV for genotype 1, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for genotype 3; scenario 3: no genotyping and SOF/DCV for all; and scenario 4: no genotyping and SOF/VEL for all. A 1-year cycle length was used to calculate the cumulative cost and effectiveness over a lifetime time horizon. We calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using a health system perspective. Costs were converted to US dollars using purchasing power parity exchange rate ($PPP). All costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%.Results Among people with no cirrhosis, scenario 3 had the minimum cost, compared with which scenario 4 was cost-effective with an ICER of 4583 $PPP per QALY (willingness-to-pay threshold: 9,311 $PPP per QALY). Among both people with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, scenario 4 was cost saving. In sensitivity analysis, scenario 4 would be also cost-saving among people with no cirrhosis provided a 39% reduction in the cost of 12 weeks SOF/VEL.Conclusion Initiating all patients on pan-genotypic generic DAA regimens with no pretreatment genotyping was cost-effective compared with scenarios requiring pretreatment HCV genotype tests. Among generic pan-genotypic DAA regimens, SOF/VEL was cost-effective, for people with no cirrhosis and cost-saving for those with cirrhosis.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e058757.full
spellingShingle Seyed Moayed Alavian
Mohammad Tasavon Gholamhoseini
Heidar Sharafi
Helena HL Borba
Asma Sabermahani
Behzad Hajarizadeh
Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study
BMJ Open
title Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study
title_full Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study
title_short Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study
title_sort economic evaluation of pan genotypic generic direct acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis c in iran a cost effectiveness study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e058757.full
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedmoayedalavian economicevaluationofpangenotypicgenericdirectactingantiviralregimensfortreatmentofchronichepatitisciniranacosteffectivenessstudy
AT mohammadtasavongholamhoseini economicevaluationofpangenotypicgenericdirectactingantiviralregimensfortreatmentofchronichepatitisciniranacosteffectivenessstudy
AT heidarsharafi economicevaluationofpangenotypicgenericdirectactingantiviralregimensfortreatmentofchronichepatitisciniranacosteffectivenessstudy
AT helenahlborba economicevaluationofpangenotypicgenericdirectactingantiviralregimensfortreatmentofchronichepatitisciniranacosteffectivenessstudy
AT asmasabermahani economicevaluationofpangenotypicgenericdirectactingantiviralregimensfortreatmentofchronichepatitisciniranacosteffectivenessstudy
AT behzadhajarizadeh economicevaluationofpangenotypicgenericdirectactingantiviralregimensfortreatmentofchronichepatitisciniranacosteffectivenessstudy