L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture
The research explores the procedural context of French closed competitions in which the program appears as an essential link between defining a commission and designing the work. In this light, a programming agency sought the help of a research laboratory at a school of architecture to understand ho...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Ministère de la culture
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale, Urbaine et Paysagère |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/craup/14382 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832580324217847808 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandre Delbos Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger |
| author_facet | Alexandre Delbos Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger |
| author_sort | Alexandre Delbos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The research explores the procedural context of French closed competitions in which the program appears as an essential link between defining a commission and designing the work. In this light, a programming agency sought the help of a research laboratory at a school of architecture to understand how architects use this document. What information catches their attention? What conditions do designers feel must be met for the program to stimulate their creativity?This article presents the results of this research partnership based on a qualitative survey conducted in 2019 and 2020 among 16 architects in charge of agencies. Further, it refines the results of research conducted by the laboratory on a national scale, regarding the conduct of competitions during the period 2006-2015. It shows that, beyond the issues of excessively vague or prescriptive commissions, architects seek signs of strong political support for the project, along with prioritized expectations. An emerging need among designers is to understand the foundations of the choices made in order to appreciate their robustness, allowing them to fully embrace the program’s liberties and to be better placed to transcend them. Meanwhile, professionals tasked with writing the program are often encouraged by clients to provide specifications at the competition stage, setting out design solutions without justification and ultimately fostering a sense of mistrust. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b62e8d286978479ca88ffc4e6c5a15f0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2606-7498 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Ministère de la culture |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale, Urbaine et Paysagère |
| spelling | doaj-art-b62e8d286978479ca88ffc4e6c5a15f02025-01-30T11:06:41ZfraMinistère de la cultureLes Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale, Urbaine et Paysagère2606-74982024-03-0110.4000/craup.14382L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouvertureAlexandre DelbosJodelle Zetlaoui-LégerThe research explores the procedural context of French closed competitions in which the program appears as an essential link between defining a commission and designing the work. In this light, a programming agency sought the help of a research laboratory at a school of architecture to understand how architects use this document. What information catches their attention? What conditions do designers feel must be met for the program to stimulate their creativity?This article presents the results of this research partnership based on a qualitative survey conducted in 2019 and 2020 among 16 architects in charge of agencies. Further, it refines the results of research conducted by the laboratory on a national scale, regarding the conduct of competitions during the period 2006-2015. It shows that, beyond the issues of excessively vague or prescriptive commissions, architects seek signs of strong political support for the project, along with prioritized expectations. An emerging need among designers is to understand the foundations of the choices made in order to appreciate their robustness, allowing them to fully embrace the program’s liberties and to be better placed to transcend them. Meanwhile, professionals tasked with writing the program are often encouraged by clients to provide specifications at the competition stage, setting out design solutions without justification and ultimately fostering a sense of mistrust.https://journals.openedition.org/craup/14382Design ProcessArchitectural ProgramProgrammingArchitectural CreativityArchitectural CompetitionFrance |
| spellingShingle | Alexandre Delbos Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale, Urbaine et Paysagère Design Process Architectural Program Programming Architectural Creativity Architectural Competition France |
| title | L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture |
| title_full | L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture |
| title_fullStr | L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture |
| title_short | L’Architecte et le programme en situation de concours : une quête de réassurance et d’ouverture |
| title_sort | l architecte et le programme en situation de concours une quete de reassurance et d ouverture |
| topic | Design Process Architectural Program Programming Architectural Creativity Architectural Competition France |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/craup/14382 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandredelbos larchitecteetleprogrammeensituationdeconcoursunequetedereassuranceetdouverture AT jodellezetlaouileger larchitecteetleprogrammeensituationdeconcoursunequetedereassuranceetdouverture |