Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?

Although the approach of contact network epidemiology has been increasing in popularity for studying transmission of infectious diseases in human populations, it has generally been an underutilized approach for investigating disease outbreaks in wildlife populations. In this paper we explore the dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meggan E. Craft, Damien Caillaud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/676949
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551421238575104
author Meggan E. Craft
Damien Caillaud
author_facet Meggan E. Craft
Damien Caillaud
author_sort Meggan E. Craft
collection DOAJ
description Although the approach of contact network epidemiology has been increasing in popularity for studying transmission of infectious diseases in human populations, it has generally been an underutilized approach for investigating disease outbreaks in wildlife populations. In this paper we explore the differences between the type of data that can be collected on human and wildlife populations, provide an update on recent advances that have been made in wildlife epidemiology by using a network approach, and discuss why networks might have been underutilized and why networks could and should be used more in the future. We conclude with ideas for future directions and a call for field biologists and network modelers to engage in more cross-disciplinary collaboration.
format Article
id doaj-art-b61c22a779c54869a1c620733acbdd82
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-708X
1687-7098
language English
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-b61c22a779c54869a1c620733acbdd822025-02-03T06:01:31ZengWileyInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases1687-708X1687-70982011-01-01201110.1155/2011/676949676949Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?Meggan E. Craft0Damien Caillaud1Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Heath, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UKSection of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USAAlthough the approach of contact network epidemiology has been increasing in popularity for studying transmission of infectious diseases in human populations, it has generally been an underutilized approach for investigating disease outbreaks in wildlife populations. In this paper we explore the differences between the type of data that can be collected on human and wildlife populations, provide an update on recent advances that have been made in wildlife epidemiology by using a network approach, and discuss why networks might have been underutilized and why networks could and should be used more in the future. We conclude with ideas for future directions and a call for field biologists and network modelers to engage in more cross-disciplinary collaboration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/676949
spellingShingle Meggan E. Craft
Damien Caillaud
Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
title Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?
title_full Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?
title_fullStr Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?
title_full_unstemmed Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?
title_short Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?
title_sort network models an underutilized tool in wildlife epidemiology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/676949
work_keys_str_mv AT megganecraft networkmodelsanunderutilizedtoolinwildlifeepidemiology
AT damiencaillaud networkmodelsanunderutilizedtoolinwildlifeepidemiology