Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years

Background. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common ligament injury of the knee joint. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using autografts or allografts is the standard of treatment for complete ACL tear. Anatomical tunnel positioning provides a better rotational as well as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thatchinamoorthy Santhamoorthy, Anish Anto Xavier, Lalithambigai Chellamuthu, Arun Kaliaperumal, Dharamveer Kumar Dubey
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 2024-12-01
Series:Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17529/pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594235016085504
author Thatchinamoorthy Santhamoorthy
Anish Anto Xavier
Lalithambigai Chellamuthu
Arun Kaliaperumal
Dharamveer Kumar Dubey
author_facet Thatchinamoorthy Santhamoorthy
Anish Anto Xavier
Lalithambigai Chellamuthu
Arun Kaliaperumal
Dharamveer Kumar Dubey
author_sort Thatchinamoorthy Santhamoorthy
collection DOAJ
description Background. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common ligament injury of the knee joint. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using autografts or allografts is the standard of treatment for complete ACL tear. Anatomical tunnel positioning provides a better rotational as well as anteroposterior stability following ACLR. Nevertheless, a well-performed anatomical ACLR does fail due to various reasons. Graft selection may be one of the contributing factors. The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and hamstring tendon autograft at a mean follow-up of 8 years. Methods. The study enrolled 150 patients who underwent primary anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Plain radiography was used to differentiate anatomical and nonanatomical reconstruction. Eighty patients (BPTB — 36, HT — 44) with anatomical reconstruction were then compared for their clinico-radiological outcome at a mean follow-up of 8 years. Results. The BPTB group showed better outcome over the HT group in terms of increased rotational and anteroposterior stability at long-term follow-up (pivot-shift test, p = 0.001; anterior drawer test, p = 0.001; the Lachman’s test, p = 0.001; radiological Lachman’s test, p = 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in terms of objective and subjective IKDC forms (p = 0.363 and p = 0.154, relatively), the Lysholm score (p = 0.894), anterior knee pain (p = 0.678), single-leg hop testing (p = 0.248) and osteoarthritic change (p = 0.550) at a mean follow-up of 8 years. Conclusions. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft resulted in superior clinical outcome over hamstring tendon autograft in terms of increased knee stability. No difference was observed between the grafts in other clinical outcomes and osteoarthritic change at a mean follow-up of 8 years.
format Article
id doaj-art-b5f3b92ba48948a09d2020043b8576da
institution Kabale University
issn 2311-2905
2542-0933
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
record_format Article
series Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
spelling doaj-art-b5f3b92ba48948a09d2020043b8576da2025-01-20T02:43:24ZrusVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTravmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii2311-29052542-09332024-12-01304728110.17816/2311-2905-175291354Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 yearsThatchinamoorthy Santhamoorthy0https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3501-2776Anish Anto Xavier1https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1374-6466Lalithambigai Chellamuthu2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2799-4549Arun Kaliaperumal3Dharamveer Kumar Dubey4https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8316-4903Indhira Gandhi Governtment General Hospital and Post Graduate InstituteIndhira Gandhi Governtment General Hospital and Post Graduate InstituteMahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research InstituteIndhira Gandhi Medical College and Research InstituteIndhira Gandhi Governtment General Hospital and Post Graduate InstituteBackground. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common ligament injury of the knee joint. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using autografts or allografts is the standard of treatment for complete ACL tear. Anatomical tunnel positioning provides a better rotational as well as anteroposterior stability following ACLR. Nevertheless, a well-performed anatomical ACLR does fail due to various reasons. Graft selection may be one of the contributing factors. The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and hamstring tendon autograft at a mean follow-up of 8 years. Methods. The study enrolled 150 patients who underwent primary anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Plain radiography was used to differentiate anatomical and nonanatomical reconstruction. Eighty patients (BPTB — 36, HT — 44) with anatomical reconstruction were then compared for their clinico-radiological outcome at a mean follow-up of 8 years. Results. The BPTB group showed better outcome over the HT group in terms of increased rotational and anteroposterior stability at long-term follow-up (pivot-shift test, p = 0.001; anterior drawer test, p = 0.001; the Lachman’s test, p = 0.001; radiological Lachman’s test, p = 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in terms of objective and subjective IKDC forms (p = 0.363 and p = 0.154, relatively), the Lysholm score (p = 0.894), anterior knee pain (p = 0.678), single-leg hop testing (p = 0.248) and osteoarthritic change (p = 0.550) at a mean follow-up of 8 years. Conclusions. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft resulted in superior clinical outcome over hamstring tendon autograft in terms of increased knee stability. No difference was observed between the grafts in other clinical outcomes and osteoarthritic change at a mean follow-up of 8 years.https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17529/pdfanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionbone-patellar tendon-bone autografthamstring tendon autograft
spellingShingle Thatchinamoorthy Santhamoorthy
Anish Anto Xavier
Lalithambigai Chellamuthu
Arun Kaliaperumal
Dharamveer Kumar Dubey
Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years
Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft
hamstring tendon autograft
title Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years
title_full Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years
title_fullStr Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years
title_full_unstemmed Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years
title_short Bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes at a mean follow-up of 8 years
title_sort bone patellar tendon bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes at a mean follow up of 8 years
topic anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft
hamstring tendon autograft
url https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17529/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT thatchinamoorthysanthamoorthy bonepatellartendonbonevshamstringtendonautograftforanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionoutcomesatameanfollowupof8years
AT anishantoxavier bonepatellartendonbonevshamstringtendonautograftforanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionoutcomesatameanfollowupof8years
AT lalithambigaichellamuthu bonepatellartendonbonevshamstringtendonautograftforanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionoutcomesatameanfollowupof8years
AT arunkaliaperumal bonepatellartendonbonevshamstringtendonautograftforanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionoutcomesatameanfollowupof8years
AT dharamveerkumardubey bonepatellartendonbonevshamstringtendonautograftforanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionoutcomesatameanfollowupof8years