Appropriating Epistemic Norms of Science through Sustained Practice with Argumentation: Can It Happen? A Learning Progressions Perspective
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of sustained practice with argumentation on the quality of students’ written arguments. Participants consisted of 37 students; 22 males and 15 females enrolled in a 6th grade middle school classroom. Students completed six argumentation tasks but...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Mehmet Aydeniz, Kader Bilican |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Seyit Ahmet Kıray
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/23 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Effect of Socioscientific Topics on Discourse within an Online Game Designed to Engage Middle School Students in Scientific Argumentation
by: Jana Craig-Hare, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Pharmacy Undergraduates’ Epistemic Cognition and Medication Beliefs as Predictors of Conceptual Learning and Academic Progress
by: Ilona Sodervik, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Peer Critiquing in Scientific Inquiry: Enhancing Preservice Teachers' Reasoning, Epistemic Knowledge, and Scientific Argumentation through Innovative Teaching Strategies in an Undergraduate Science Content Course
by: Esther Kataate Namakula, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Deficit of conceivability: response to Bogdan Faul’s article «Minimal dualism and epistemic approach»
by: T. S. Demin
Published: (2021-02-01) -
The Limits of Computer Science. Weizsäcker’s Argument
by: Olszewski Adam
Published: (2024-12-01)