The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation

The application of historical analogies in Russian and Ukrainian presidential discourses in the initial period of the special military operation (24.02-21.09.2022) is noteworthy. The purpose of the study was to identify their functional role. The results demonstrated that two ontologies of the confl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vladimir O. Bekliamishev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2024-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/42653/24436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576009981919232
author Vladimir O. Bekliamishev
author_facet Vladimir O. Bekliamishev
author_sort Vladimir O. Bekliamishev
collection DOAJ
description The application of historical analogies in Russian and Ukrainian presidential discourses in the initial period of the special military operation (24.02-21.09.2022) is noteworthy. The purpose of the study was to identify their functional role. The results demonstrated that two ontologies of the conflict coexisted in the Russian presidential discourse. The dominant ontology, set by a parallel with the Great Patriotic War, assumed the collective West as an enemy, that uses Ukraine as a “foothold”. The second ontology, described through a parallel with the Russian Civil War, gave Ukraine greater subjectivity, assigning the collective West the role of a third party benefiting from the conflict. In turn, the repertoire of historical analogies in the Ukrainian presidential discourse was much broader, but most of the identified parallels were based on precedent situations from foreign history and were used to influence the perception of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict by the countries of the collective West. The noted imbalance was partly since unresolved structural conflicts between Soviet and nationalist narratives prevented Ukrainian elites from effectively using historical arguments in domestic political communication.
format Article
id doaj-art-b5dbabdeb3534b1d94db99c0c4a16910
institution Kabale University
issn 2313-1438
2313-1446
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN Journal of Political Science
spelling doaj-art-b5dbabdeb3534b1d94db99c0c4a169102025-01-31T15:05:46ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Political Science2313-14382313-14462024-12-0126464465710.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-4-644-65721138The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military OperationVladimir O. Bekliamishev0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0528-8704State Academic University for the HumanitiesThe application of historical analogies in Russian and Ukrainian presidential discourses in the initial period of the special military operation (24.02-21.09.2022) is noteworthy. The purpose of the study was to identify their functional role. The results demonstrated that two ontologies of the conflict coexisted in the Russian presidential discourse. The dominant ontology, set by a parallel with the Great Patriotic War, assumed the collective West as an enemy, that uses Ukraine as a “foothold”. The second ontology, described through a parallel with the Russian Civil War, gave Ukraine greater subjectivity, assigning the collective West the role of a third party benefiting from the conflict. In turn, the repertoire of historical analogies in the Ukrainian presidential discourse was much broader, but most of the identified parallels were based on precedent situations from foreign history and were used to influence the perception of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict by the countries of the collective West. The noted imbalance was partly since unresolved structural conflicts between Soviet and nationalist narratives prevented Ukrainian elites from effectively using historical arguments in domestic political communication.https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/42653/24436historical analogiesspecial military operationsmorussiaukrainehistorical policypolicy of memorypolitical discourse
spellingShingle Vladimir O. Bekliamishev
The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation
RUDN Journal of Political Science
historical analogies
special military operation
smo
russia
ukraine
historical policy
policy of memory
political discourse
title The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation
title_full The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation
title_fullStr The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation
title_full_unstemmed The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation
title_short The Functional Role of Historical Analogies in Russian and Ukrainian Presidential Discourses on the Special Military Operation
title_sort functional role of historical analogies in russian and ukrainian presidential discourses on the special military operation
topic historical analogies
special military operation
smo
russia
ukraine
historical policy
policy of memory
political discourse
url https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/viewFile/42653/24436
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimirobekliamishev thefunctionalroleofhistoricalanalogiesinrussianandukrainianpresidentialdiscoursesonthespecialmilitaryoperation
AT vladimirobekliamishev functionalroleofhistoricalanalogiesinrussianandukrainianpresidentialdiscoursesonthespecialmilitaryoperation