Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
The works of Luigi Foscolo Benedetto and Albert Thibaudet confront divergent contemporary voices, the vague echos and precise texts of science and criticism, archaeology and history: texts as libido and texts as objective knowledge, the status of the reader. Such tendencies usefully dovetail with cl...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/2454 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832095844097064960 |
---|---|
author | Peter-Michael Wetherill |
author_facet | Peter-Michael Wetherill |
author_sort | Peter-Michael Wetherill |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The works of Luigi Foscolo Benedetto and Albert Thibaudet confront divergent contemporary voices, the vague echos and precise texts of science and criticism, archaeology and history: texts as libido and texts as objective knowledge, the status of the reader. Such tendencies usefully dovetail with clear convergent past and future traditions. What our two scholars achieve, even if they are dated at times, is a corrective to the often journalistic, contradictory excesses of present-day readings. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-b55443dee64b4ab5a17751ca3a874875 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1969-6191 |
language | fra |
publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
publisher | Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) |
record_format | Article |
series | Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique |
spelling | doaj-art-b55443dee64b4ab5a17751ca3a8748752025-02-05T16:29:18ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912015-12-011410.4000/flaubert.2454Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922Peter-Michael WetherillThe works of Luigi Foscolo Benedetto and Albert Thibaudet confront divergent contemporary voices, the vague echos and precise texts of science and criticism, archaeology and history: texts as libido and texts as objective knowledge, the status of the reader. Such tendencies usefully dovetail with clear convergent past and future traditions. What our two scholars achieve, even if they are dated at times, is a corrective to the often journalistic, contradictory excesses of present-day readings.https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/2454 |
spellingShingle | Peter-Michael Wetherill Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922 Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique |
title | Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922 |
title_full | Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922 |
title_fullStr | Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922 |
title_full_unstemmed | Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922 |
title_short | Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922 |
title_sort | luigi foscolo benedetto 1920 albert thibaudet 1922 |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/2454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petermichaelwetherill luigifoscolobenedetto1920albertthibaudet1922 |