Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922

The works of Luigi Foscolo Benedetto and Albert Thibaudet confront divergent contemporary voices, the vague echos and precise texts of science and criticism, archaeology and history: texts as libido and texts as objective knowledge, the status of the reader. Such tendencies usefully dovetail with cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter-Michael Wetherill
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) 2015-12-01
Series:Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/2454
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095844097064960
author Peter-Michael Wetherill
author_facet Peter-Michael Wetherill
author_sort Peter-Michael Wetherill
collection DOAJ
description The works of Luigi Foscolo Benedetto and Albert Thibaudet confront divergent contemporary voices, the vague echos and precise texts of science and criticism, archaeology and history: texts as libido and texts as objective knowledge, the status of the reader. Such tendencies usefully dovetail with clear convergent past and future traditions. What our two scholars achieve, even if they are dated at times, is a corrective to the often journalistic, contradictory excesses of present-day readings.
format Article
id doaj-art-b55443dee64b4ab5a17751ca3a874875
institution Kabale University
issn 1969-6191
language fra
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
record_format Article
series Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
spelling doaj-art-b55443dee64b4ab5a17751ca3a8748752025-02-05T16:29:18ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912015-12-011410.4000/flaubert.2454Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922Peter-Michael WetherillThe works of Luigi Foscolo Benedetto and Albert Thibaudet confront divergent contemporary voices, the vague echos and precise texts of science and criticism, archaeology and history: texts as libido and texts as objective knowledge, the status of the reader. Such tendencies usefully dovetail with clear convergent past and future traditions. What our two scholars achieve, even if they are dated at times, is a corrective to the often journalistic, contradictory excesses of present-day readings.https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/2454
spellingShingle Peter-Michael Wetherill
Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
title Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
title_full Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
title_fullStr Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
title_full_unstemmed Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
title_short Luigi Foscolo Benedetto 1920 – Albert Thibaudet 1922
title_sort luigi foscolo benedetto 1920 albert thibaudet 1922
url https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/2454
work_keys_str_mv AT petermichaelwetherill luigifoscolobenedetto1920albertthibaudet1922