Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes

The term minerality is often used to describe high-quality still white wines produced in cooler regions, such as Chablis. What minerality means in sensory terms and what is responsible for its presence is the subject of debate, however. This study explored the concept of minerality by analysing 16,5...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex J. Biss, Richard H. Ellis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/4299446
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546216070610944
author Alex J. Biss
Richard H. Ellis
author_facet Alex J. Biss
Richard H. Ellis
author_sort Alex J. Biss
collection DOAJ
description The term minerality is often used to describe high-quality still white wines produced in cooler regions, such as Chablis. What minerality means in sensory terms and what is responsible for its presence is the subject of debate, however. This study explored the concept of minerality by analysing 16,542 Chablis Premier Cru tasting notes entered into CellarTracker between 2003 and 2022 on wines three to seven years old, together with weather, topography, and soil data for the Chablis area. The top three words used to describe Chablis Premier Cru wine were citrus, minerality, and acidity. Mentions of minerality declined between 1999 and 2019 vintages, whereas those of acidity, salinity, floral, orchard fruit, and stone fruit increased. The trends for minerality and salinity were slightly stronger with the year of tasting (2005 to 2022) than vintage. Bigram analysis indicated that consumers were more than 1.5 times as likely to refer to a stony kind of minerality as a saline one and only rarely smoky minerality. Use of the term minerality was correlated with growing season temperature and sunshine hours (negatively with each), as well as vineyard aspect (negatively with percentage vineyard area facing South or South-West), but not with Kimmeridgian soil type. The results imply that soils and geology are not a principal source of minerality in Chablis wine, but growing season warmth and sunshine are relevant to minerality. There is no simple explanation of minerality in Chablis wine; however, the recent decline in the use of this term for Chablis wine may be a consequence of three factors in combination: (i) it has become less fashionable; (ii) consumers are choosing “saline” instead of “mineral” when appropriate, but retaining it for “stony” sensations; and/or (iii) warming from climate change has reduced minerality.
format Article
id doaj-art-b40ebd06fe894291b0d9ffb67388f280
institution Kabale University
issn 1755-0238
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
spelling doaj-art-b40ebd06fe894291b0d9ffb67388f2802025-02-03T07:23:41ZengWileyAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine Research1755-02382024-01-01202410.1155/2024/4299446Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting NotesAlex J. Biss0Richard H. Ellis1School of AgricultureSchool of AgricultureThe term minerality is often used to describe high-quality still white wines produced in cooler regions, such as Chablis. What minerality means in sensory terms and what is responsible for its presence is the subject of debate, however. This study explored the concept of minerality by analysing 16,542 Chablis Premier Cru tasting notes entered into CellarTracker between 2003 and 2022 on wines three to seven years old, together with weather, topography, and soil data for the Chablis area. The top three words used to describe Chablis Premier Cru wine were citrus, minerality, and acidity. Mentions of minerality declined between 1999 and 2019 vintages, whereas those of acidity, salinity, floral, orchard fruit, and stone fruit increased. The trends for minerality and salinity were slightly stronger with the year of tasting (2005 to 2022) than vintage. Bigram analysis indicated that consumers were more than 1.5 times as likely to refer to a stony kind of minerality as a saline one and only rarely smoky minerality. Use of the term minerality was correlated with growing season temperature and sunshine hours (negatively with each), as well as vineyard aspect (negatively with percentage vineyard area facing South or South-West), but not with Kimmeridgian soil type. The results imply that soils and geology are not a principal source of minerality in Chablis wine, but growing season warmth and sunshine are relevant to minerality. There is no simple explanation of minerality in Chablis wine; however, the recent decline in the use of this term for Chablis wine may be a consequence of three factors in combination: (i) it has become less fashionable; (ii) consumers are choosing “saline” instead of “mineral” when appropriate, but retaining it for “stony” sensations; and/or (iii) warming from climate change has reduced minerality.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/4299446
spellingShingle Alex J. Biss
Richard H. Ellis
Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
title Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes
title_full Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes
title_fullStr Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes
title_full_unstemmed Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes
title_short Minerality in Wine: Textual Analysis of Chablis Premier Cru Tasting Notes
title_sort minerality in wine textual analysis of chablis premier cru tasting notes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/4299446
work_keys_str_mv AT alexjbiss mineralityinwinetextualanalysisofchablispremiercrutastingnotes
AT richardhellis mineralityinwinetextualanalysisofchablispremiercrutastingnotes