Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids

Yeast cells sometimes engage in interspecific hybridization, i.e., crosses between different species. These interspecific yeast hybrids combine phenotypes of the two parental species and can therefore allow fast adaptation to new niches. This is perhaps most evident in beer yeasts, where a cross bet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo Murath, Stephanie Hoffmann, Beatriz Herrera-Malaver, Luis Bustamante, Kevin Verstrepen, Jan Steensels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1472832/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582913261043712
author Pablo Murath
Pablo Murath
Stephanie Hoffmann
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Luis Bustamante
Kevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
Jan Steensels
Jan Steensels
Jan Steensels
author_facet Pablo Murath
Pablo Murath
Stephanie Hoffmann
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Luis Bustamante
Kevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
Jan Steensels
Jan Steensels
Jan Steensels
author_sort Pablo Murath
collection DOAJ
description Yeast cells sometimes engage in interspecific hybridization, i.e., crosses between different species. These interspecific yeast hybrids combine phenotypes of the two parental species and can therefore allow fast adaptation to new niches. This is perhaps most evident in beer yeasts, where a cross between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus led to the emergence of the lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus, which combines the fermentation capacity of S. cerevisiae with the cold tolerance of S. eubayanus, making the hybrid suitable for the typical cool lager beer fermentation conditions. Interestingly, however, merging two different genomes into one cell causes genomic instability and rearrangements, ultimately leading to a reorganized but more stable hybrid genome. Here, we investigate how different parameters influence this genome stabilization trajectory and ultimately can lead to variants with different industrial phenotypes. We generated seven de novo interspecific hybrids between two S. eubayanus strains and an ale S. cerevisiae strain, subsequently exposing them to three different genome stabilization procedures. Next, we analyzed the fermentation characteristics and metabolite production of selected stabilized hybrids. Our results reveal how variation in the genome stabilization procedure leads to phenotypic variability and can generate additional diversity after the initial hybridization process. Moreover, several stabilized hybrids showed phenotypes that are interesting for industrial applications.
format Article
id doaj-art-b400c042bd3d4c3795073834325056bd
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-302X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-b400c042bd3d4c3795073834325056bd2025-01-29T06:45:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2025-01-011610.3389/fmicb.2025.14728321472832Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybridsPablo Murath0Pablo Murath1Stephanie Hoffmann2Beatriz Herrera-Malaver3Beatriz Herrera-Malaver4Beatriz Herrera-Malaver5Luis Bustamante6Kevin Verstrepen7Kevin Verstrepen8Kevin Verstrepen9Jan Steensels10Jan Steensels11Jan Steensels12Departmento de Análisis Instrumental, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, ChileDepartamento de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, ChileDepartamento de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, ChileLeuven Institute for Beer Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Bio-Incubator, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Systems Biology, VIB Centre for Microbiology, Bio-Incubator, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Genetics and Genomics, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics (CMPG), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartmento de Análisis Instrumental, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, ChileLeuven Institute for Beer Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Bio-Incubator, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Systems Biology, VIB Centre for Microbiology, Bio-Incubator, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Genetics and Genomics, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics (CMPG), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumLeuven Institute for Beer Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Bio-Incubator, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Systems Biology, VIB Centre for Microbiology, Bio-Incubator, Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Genetics and Genomics, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics (CMPG), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumYeast cells sometimes engage in interspecific hybridization, i.e., crosses between different species. These interspecific yeast hybrids combine phenotypes of the two parental species and can therefore allow fast adaptation to new niches. This is perhaps most evident in beer yeasts, where a cross between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus led to the emergence of the lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus, which combines the fermentation capacity of S. cerevisiae with the cold tolerance of S. eubayanus, making the hybrid suitable for the typical cool lager beer fermentation conditions. Interestingly, however, merging two different genomes into one cell causes genomic instability and rearrangements, ultimately leading to a reorganized but more stable hybrid genome. Here, we investigate how different parameters influence this genome stabilization trajectory and ultimately can lead to variants with different industrial phenotypes. We generated seven de novo interspecific hybrids between two S. eubayanus strains and an ale S. cerevisiae strain, subsequently exposing them to three different genome stabilization procedures. Next, we analyzed the fermentation characteristics and metabolite production of selected stabilized hybrids. Our results reveal how variation in the genome stabilization procedure leads to phenotypic variability and can generate additional diversity after the initial hybridization process. Moreover, several stabilized hybrids showed phenotypes that are interesting for industrial applications.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1472832/fullLager yeastinterspecific hybridsgenome stabilizationflavor productionbrewing
spellingShingle Pablo Murath
Pablo Murath
Stephanie Hoffmann
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
Luis Bustamante
Kevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
Jan Steensels
Jan Steensels
Jan Steensels
Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
Frontiers in Microbiology
Lager yeast
interspecific hybrids
genome stabilization
flavor production
brewing
title Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
title_full Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
title_fullStr Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
title_full_unstemmed Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
title_short Distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
title_sort distinct genome stabilization procedures lead to phenotypic variability in newly generated interspecific yeast hybrids
topic Lager yeast
interspecific hybrids
genome stabilization
flavor production
brewing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1472832/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pablomurath distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT pablomurath distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT stephaniehoffmann distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT beatrizherreramalaver distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT beatrizherreramalaver distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT beatrizherreramalaver distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT luisbustamante distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT kevinverstrepen distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT kevinverstrepen distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT kevinverstrepen distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT jansteensels distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT jansteensels distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids
AT jansteensels distinctgenomestabilizationproceduresleadtophenotypicvariabilityinnewlygeneratedinterspecificyeasthybrids