Comparative Analysis of Prior and Posterior Integrity Monitoring Techniques for Enhanced Global Navigation Satellite System Positioning Continuity and Accuracy

GNSS integrity is an essential component for ensuring the reliability of safety-critical applications using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs). These applications, such as use in aviation and autonomous vehicles, demand high precision and dependability. There are two major GNSS integrity mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuting Gao, Baoyu Liu, Yang Gao, Guanwen Huang, Qin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/4/723
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:GNSS integrity is an essential component for ensuring the reliability of safety-critical applications using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs). These applications, such as use in aviation and autonomous vehicles, demand high precision and dependability. There are two major GNSS integrity monitoring techniques, namely prior and posterior integrity monitoring. The principles of the two approaches, however, differ significantly, each influencing the GNSS positioning system’s continuity and accuracy performance in unique ways. In this study, we conduct a thorough evaluation and comparison of these two approaches to integrity monitoring, focusing on their effects on continuity and accuracy performance. We assess the probability of false alarms and continuity risks associated with posterior integrity monitoring by defining specific geometric spheres, both inside and outside the contours of the parity set, where the integrity risk requirement is satisfied. By using these defined spheres, we determine the lower and upper bounds for the probability of false alarms and continuity risks in posterior integrity monitoring. These spheres provide a novel and effective framework for comparing the continuity performance between the Chi-squared residual-based prior and posterior integrity monitoring. Our analysis highlights that, under fault-free scenarios, posterior integrity monitoring offers superior accuracy compared with the Chi-squared residual-based prior integrity monitoring approach. This finding underscores the critical importance of selecting an appropriate integrity monitoring strategy to enhance GNSS positioning system performance, particularly in environments where safety and precision are paramount. The insights gained from this study contribute to the advancement of GNSS technologies, supporting their implementation in an increasingly wide range of safety-critical applications.
ISSN:2072-4292