Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy

Purpose. To compare three 360°-laser retinopexy (LRP) approaches (using navigated pattern laser system, single-spot slit-lamp (SL) laser delivery, and single-spot indirect ophthalmoscope (IO) laser delivery) in regard to procedure duration, procedural pain score, technical difficulties, and the abil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexei N. Kulikov, Dmitrii S. Maltsev, Ernest V. Boiko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9871976
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548146508464128
author Alexei N. Kulikov
Dmitrii S. Maltsev
Ernest V. Boiko
author_facet Alexei N. Kulikov
Dmitrii S. Maltsev
Ernest V. Boiko
author_sort Alexei N. Kulikov
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare three 360°-laser retinopexy (LRP) approaches (using navigated pattern laser system, single-spot slit-lamp (SL) laser delivery, and single-spot indirect ophthalmoscope (IO) laser delivery) in regard to procedure duration, procedural pain score, technical difficulties, and the ability to achieve surgical goals. Material and Methods. Eighty-six rhegmatogenous retinal detachment patients (86 eyes) were included in this prospective randomized study. The mean procedural time, procedural pain score (using 4-point Verbal Rating Scale), number of laser burns, and achievement of the surgical goals were compared between three groups (pattern LRP (Navilas® laser system), 36 patients; SL-LRP, 28 patients; and IO-LRP, 22 patients). Results. In the pattern LRP group, the amount of time needed for LRP and pain level were statistically significantly lower, whereas the number of applied laser burns was higher compared to those in the SL-LRP group and in the IO-LRP group. In the pattern LRP, SL-LRP, and IO-LRP groups, surgical goals were fully achieved in 28 (77.8%), 17 (60.7%), and 13 patients (59.1%), respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion. The navigated pattern approach allows improving the treatment time and pain in postoperative 360° LRP. Moreover, 360° pattern LRP is at least as effective in achieving the surgical goal as the conventional (slit-lamp or indirect ophthalmoscope) approaches with a single-spot laser.
format Article
id doaj-art-b35e916026014bde979c67e9f579657c
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-b35e916026014bde979c67e9f579657c2025-02-03T06:42:03ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/98719769871976Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser RetinopexyAlexei N. Kulikov0Dmitrii S. Maltsev1Ernest V. Boiko2Department of Ophthalmology, Military Medical Academy, 5 Klinicheskaya St., St. Petersburg 194044, RussiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Medical Academy, 5 Klinicheskaya St., St. Petersburg 194044, RussiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Medical Academy, 5 Klinicheskaya St., St. Petersburg 194044, RussiaPurpose. To compare three 360°-laser retinopexy (LRP) approaches (using navigated pattern laser system, single-spot slit-lamp (SL) laser delivery, and single-spot indirect ophthalmoscope (IO) laser delivery) in regard to procedure duration, procedural pain score, technical difficulties, and the ability to achieve surgical goals. Material and Methods. Eighty-six rhegmatogenous retinal detachment patients (86 eyes) were included in this prospective randomized study. The mean procedural time, procedural pain score (using 4-point Verbal Rating Scale), number of laser burns, and achievement of the surgical goals were compared between three groups (pattern LRP (Navilas® laser system), 36 patients; SL-LRP, 28 patients; and IO-LRP, 22 patients). Results. In the pattern LRP group, the amount of time needed for LRP and pain level were statistically significantly lower, whereas the number of applied laser burns was higher compared to those in the SL-LRP group and in the IO-LRP group. In the pattern LRP, SL-LRP, and IO-LRP groups, surgical goals were fully achieved in 28 (77.8%), 17 (60.7%), and 13 patients (59.1%), respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion. The navigated pattern approach allows improving the treatment time and pain in postoperative 360° LRP. Moreover, 360° pattern LRP is at least as effective in achieving the surgical goal as the conventional (slit-lamp or indirect ophthalmoscope) approaches with a single-spot laser.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9871976
spellingShingle Alexei N. Kulikov
Dmitrii S. Maltsev
Ernest V. Boiko
Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy
title_full Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy
title_fullStr Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy
title_full_unstemmed Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy
title_short Navigated Pattern Laser System versus Single-Spot Laser System for Postoperative 360-Degree Laser Retinopexy
title_sort navigated pattern laser system versus single spot laser system for postoperative 360 degree laser retinopexy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9871976
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeinkulikov navigatedpatternlasersystemversussinglespotlasersystemforpostoperative360degreelaserretinopexy
AT dmitriismaltsev navigatedpatternlasersystemversussinglespotlasersystemforpostoperative360degreelaserretinopexy
AT ernestvboiko navigatedpatternlasersystemversussinglespotlasersystemforpostoperative360degreelaserretinopexy