Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study

Abstract Aims Timely detection of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDDF) is of importance for precise risk stratification of asymptomatic subjects. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of LVDDF and its prognostic significance in the general population using two grading approaches: t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatiana Kuznetsova, Nicholas Cauwenberghs, František Sabovčik, Yukari Kobayashi, Francois Haddad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13863
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540343565811712
author Tatiana Kuznetsova
Nicholas Cauwenberghs
František Sabovčik
Yukari Kobayashi
Francois Haddad
author_facet Tatiana Kuznetsova
Nicholas Cauwenberghs
František Sabovčik
Yukari Kobayashi
Francois Haddad
author_sort Tatiana Kuznetsova
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Timely detection of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDDF) is of importance for precise risk stratification of asymptomatic subjects. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of LVDDF and its prognostic significance in the general population using two grading approaches: the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations and population‐derived, age‐specific criteria. Methods and results We randomly recruited 1407 community‐dwelling participants (mean age, 51.2 years; 51.1% women; 53.5% with cardiovascular risk factors). We measured left heart dimensions, strain, tricuspid regurgitation, transmitral blood flow, and mitral annular tissue velocities using conventional echocardiography and Doppler imaging. We utilized these measurements to grade of LVDDF according to the 2016 recommendations and population‐derived, age‐specific approach. According to the 2016 recommendations, 26 subjects (1.85%) were classified as having the advanced stage (Grade 2), whereas in 109 participants (7.75%) diastolic function was indeterminate. When applying the population‐derived criteria, the prevalence of advanced LVDDF was 17.9% (n = 252). During the follow‐up period (8.4 years), 100 participants experienced adverse cardiac events. After full adjustment, we did not observe any significant differences in the risk of events between subjects with indeterminate or any grade of LVDDF and subjects with normal diastolic function when classified according to the 2016 recommendation (P ≥ 0.25). In contrast, the adjusted risks of adverse cardiac events (HR = 1.28; P = 0.0045) were significantly elevated in participants with LVDDF when classified according to the population‐derived criteria. Conclusions Our study underscored the importance of considering age‐ and population‐derived thresholds in LVDDF grading in subjects at high cardiovascular risk which led to a better risk stratification and outcome prediction.
format Article
id doaj-art-b331bf1deca14cb0a4ea957f9d083b03
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-5822
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj-art-b331bf1deca14cb0a4ea957f9d083b032025-02-05T05:22:10ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222022-06-01931775178310.1002/ehf2.13863Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome studyTatiana Kuznetsova0Nicholas Cauwenberghs1František Sabovčik2Yukari Kobayashi3Francois Haddad4Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven Campus Sint Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 7, box 7001 Leuven B‐3000 BelgiumResearch Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven Campus Sint Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 7, box 7001 Leuven B‐3000 BelgiumResearch Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven Campus Sint Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 7, box 7001 Leuven B‐3000 BelgiumStanford Cardiovascular Institute Stanford CA USAStanford Cardiovascular Institute Stanford CA USAAbstract Aims Timely detection of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDDF) is of importance for precise risk stratification of asymptomatic subjects. Here, we evaluated the prevalence of LVDDF and its prognostic significance in the general population using two grading approaches: the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations and population‐derived, age‐specific criteria. Methods and results We randomly recruited 1407 community‐dwelling participants (mean age, 51.2 years; 51.1% women; 53.5% with cardiovascular risk factors). We measured left heart dimensions, strain, tricuspid regurgitation, transmitral blood flow, and mitral annular tissue velocities using conventional echocardiography and Doppler imaging. We utilized these measurements to grade of LVDDF according to the 2016 recommendations and population‐derived, age‐specific approach. According to the 2016 recommendations, 26 subjects (1.85%) were classified as having the advanced stage (Grade 2), whereas in 109 participants (7.75%) diastolic function was indeterminate. When applying the population‐derived criteria, the prevalence of advanced LVDDF was 17.9% (n = 252). During the follow‐up period (8.4 years), 100 participants experienced adverse cardiac events. After full adjustment, we did not observe any significant differences in the risk of events between subjects with indeterminate or any grade of LVDDF and subjects with normal diastolic function when classified according to the 2016 recommendation (P ≥ 0.25). In contrast, the adjusted risks of adverse cardiac events (HR = 1.28; P = 0.0045) were significantly elevated in participants with LVDDF when classified according to the population‐derived criteria. Conclusions Our study underscored the importance of considering age‐ and population‐derived thresholds in LVDDF grading in subjects at high cardiovascular risk which led to a better risk stratification and outcome prediction.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13863PopulationEchocardiographyDiastolic dysfunctionGrading approachesPrognosis
spellingShingle Tatiana Kuznetsova
Nicholas Cauwenberghs
František Sabovčik
Yukari Kobayashi
Francois Haddad
Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study
ESC Heart Failure
Population
Echocardiography
Diastolic dysfunction
Grading approaches
Prognosis
title Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study
title_full Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study
title_fullStr Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study
title_short Evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction: an outcome study
title_sort evaluation of diastole by echocardiography for detecting early cardiac dysfunction an outcome study
topic Population
Echocardiography
Diastolic dysfunction
Grading approaches
Prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13863
work_keys_str_mv AT tatianakuznetsova evaluationofdiastolebyechocardiographyfordetectingearlycardiacdysfunctionanoutcomestudy
AT nicholascauwenberghs evaluationofdiastolebyechocardiographyfordetectingearlycardiacdysfunctionanoutcomestudy
AT frantiseksabovcik evaluationofdiastolebyechocardiographyfordetectingearlycardiacdysfunctionanoutcomestudy
AT yukarikobayashi evaluationofdiastolebyechocardiographyfordetectingearlycardiacdysfunctionanoutcomestudy
AT francoishaddad evaluationofdiastolebyechocardiographyfordetectingearlycardiacdysfunctionanoutcomestudy