Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair
Looking at media content, especially since the beginning of the war in Ukraine in 2022 and the subsequent conflicts, it is repeatedly confirmed that basic journalistic principles are entangled in political and economic agendas. Media-dictated agendas have become the framework within which thinking i...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Communication Direction Institute, Novi Sad & University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Sciences, Belgrade
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | CM. Communication and Media |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2466-541X/2024/2466-541X2455091K.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832096696702599168 |
|---|---|
| author | Kulić Milica |
| author_facet | Kulić Milica |
| author_sort | Kulić Milica |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Looking at media content, especially since the beginning of the war in Ukraine in 2022 and the subsequent conflicts, it is repeatedly confirmed that basic journalistic principles are entangled in political and economic agendas. Media-dictated agendas have become the framework within which thinking is constrained. Public opinions are confined within existing agendas, further restricted by new media iron curtain. The media, captured not only by individual political and economic interests of the government or owners but also by the necessary global worldview to which the government belongs, are restrained. Journalists seem to be expected not to be objective but engaged, fueling ideological frameworks and refraining from questioning their own policies, thus reinforcing the fortress of ideological extremism where media and their owners sit. Therefore, this theoretical work will examine changes in the journalistic profession by questioning objectivity in the context of a paradigm repair. It will attempt to establish whether the journalistic profession requires new definitions or can exist within its traditional professional framework. Additionally, it will try to determine whether the process of media capture is a legitimization of the existing state or a propaganda context of the era that professional journalism can address. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b322b60d14274f5aa3453ca9bc729174 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2466-541X 2466-5452 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Communication Direction Institute, Novi Sad & University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Sciences, Belgrade |
| record_format | Article |
| series | CM. Communication and Media |
| spelling | doaj-art-b322b60d14274f5aa3453ca9bc7291742025-02-05T12:21:17ZengCommunication Direction Institute, Novi Sad & University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Sciences, BelgradeCM. Communication and Media2466-541X2466-54522024-01-0119559110510.5937/cm19-484572466-541X2455091KFlux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repairKulić Milica0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-9092Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, beograd, SerbiaLooking at media content, especially since the beginning of the war in Ukraine in 2022 and the subsequent conflicts, it is repeatedly confirmed that basic journalistic principles are entangled in political and economic agendas. Media-dictated agendas have become the framework within which thinking is constrained. Public opinions are confined within existing agendas, further restricted by new media iron curtain. The media, captured not only by individual political and economic interests of the government or owners but also by the necessary global worldview to which the government belongs, are restrained. Journalists seem to be expected not to be objective but engaged, fueling ideological frameworks and refraining from questioning their own policies, thus reinforcing the fortress of ideological extremism where media and their owners sit. Therefore, this theoretical work will examine changes in the journalistic profession by questioning objectivity in the context of a paradigm repair. It will attempt to establish whether the journalistic profession requires new definitions or can exist within its traditional professional framework. Additionally, it will try to determine whether the process of media capture is a legitimization of the existing state or a propaganda context of the era that professional journalism can address.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2466-541X/2024/2466-541X2455091K.pdfjournalismprofessional standardsobjectivityparadigm repairmedia capture |
| spellingShingle | Kulić Milica Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair CM. Communication and Media journalism professional standards objectivity paradigm repair media capture |
| title | Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair |
| title_full | Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair |
| title_fullStr | Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair |
| title_full_unstemmed | Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair |
| title_short | Flux of the professional standards: Objectivity, advocacy journalism and paradigm repair |
| title_sort | flux of the professional standards objectivity advocacy journalism and paradigm repair |
| topic | journalism professional standards objectivity paradigm repair media capture |
| url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2466-541X/2024/2466-541X2455091K.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kulicmilica fluxoftheprofessionalstandardsobjectivityadvocacyjournalismandparadigmrepair |