Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?

Background. Assessment of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the most reliable, though invasive method for evaluation of portal hypertension. Non-invasive, elastography-based techniques are well established in diagnosis, but not in monitoring of portal hypertension. The aim of our prospectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Binzberger, Mark Hänle, Matthias Pfahler, Wolfgang Kratzer, Thomas Seufferlein, Eugen Zizer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7384144
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555199887048704
author Andreas Binzberger
Mark Hänle
Matthias Pfahler
Wolfgang Kratzer
Thomas Seufferlein
Eugen Zizer
author_facet Andreas Binzberger
Mark Hänle
Matthias Pfahler
Wolfgang Kratzer
Thomas Seufferlein
Eugen Zizer
author_sort Andreas Binzberger
collection DOAJ
description Background. Assessment of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the most reliable, though invasive method for evaluation of portal hypertension. Non-invasive, elastography-based techniques are well established in diagnosis, but not in monitoring of portal hypertension. The aim of our prospective study was to determine the value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography technique of the liver and spleen in diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension. Methods. We prospectively assessed portal hypertension by HVPG and corresponding elastography of the liver and spleen in 31 patients with liver cirrhosis and an indication for primary prophylaxis by non-cardio selective beta-blockers. Investigations were performed at baseline and a follow-up visit after 6-8 weeks. To address the known large variability of values for spleen elastography, well-defined corresponding areas in the spleen were used for baseline and follow-up elastography. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC values for both spleen and liver elastography monitoring of portal hypertension were calculated. Results. Liver but not spleen elastography significantly correlated with HVPG results and was suitable for initial evaluation of portal hypertension. However, changes in HVPG results did not show any correlation with alterations of ARFI values from baseline to follow-up visits both for liver and spleen elastography. Spleen stiffness results were not homogeneous across the whole organ differing significantly between the upper, hilar, and bottom placed investigation areas. Conclusions. In this prospective study ARFI-based assessment of liver elastography showed itself suitable for initial assessment but not for monitoring of portal hypertension. Spleen elastography was not appropriate for both, evaluation and monitoring of portal hypertension. A possible explanation for this new data that are in some contrast to previously published results is the degree of portal hypertension in our study, a comparatively short follow-up period, and well-defined investigation areas for spleen elastography in repetitive ARFI investigations. This trial is registered with NCT03315767.
format Article
id doaj-art-b2fa3b09a9f744e6b366538d8302707f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3456
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-b2fa3b09a9f744e6b366538d8302707f2025-02-03T05:49:19ZengWileyInternational Journal of Hepatology2090-34562022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7384144Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?Andreas Binzberger0Mark Hänle1Matthias Pfahler2Wolfgang Kratzer3Thomas Seufferlein4Eugen Zizer5Department of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of AnesthesiologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyDepartment of GastroenterologyBackground. Assessment of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the most reliable, though invasive method for evaluation of portal hypertension. Non-invasive, elastography-based techniques are well established in diagnosis, but not in monitoring of portal hypertension. The aim of our prospective study was to determine the value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography technique of the liver and spleen in diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension. Methods. We prospectively assessed portal hypertension by HVPG and corresponding elastography of the liver and spleen in 31 patients with liver cirrhosis and an indication for primary prophylaxis by non-cardio selective beta-blockers. Investigations were performed at baseline and a follow-up visit after 6-8 weeks. To address the known large variability of values for spleen elastography, well-defined corresponding areas in the spleen were used for baseline and follow-up elastography. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC values for both spleen and liver elastography monitoring of portal hypertension were calculated. Results. Liver but not spleen elastography significantly correlated with HVPG results and was suitable for initial evaluation of portal hypertension. However, changes in HVPG results did not show any correlation with alterations of ARFI values from baseline to follow-up visits both for liver and spleen elastography. Spleen stiffness results were not homogeneous across the whole organ differing significantly between the upper, hilar, and bottom placed investigation areas. Conclusions. In this prospective study ARFI-based assessment of liver elastography showed itself suitable for initial assessment but not for monitoring of portal hypertension. Spleen elastography was not appropriate for both, evaluation and monitoring of portal hypertension. A possible explanation for this new data that are in some contrast to previously published results is the degree of portal hypertension in our study, a comparatively short follow-up period, and well-defined investigation areas for spleen elastography in repetitive ARFI investigations. This trial is registered with NCT03315767.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7384144
spellingShingle Andreas Binzberger
Mark Hänle
Matthias Pfahler
Wolfgang Kratzer
Thomas Seufferlein
Eugen Zizer
Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
International Journal of Hepatology
title Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
title_full Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
title_fullStr Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
title_full_unstemmed Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
title_short Spleen and Liver Stiffness Evaluation by ARFI Imaging: A Reliable Tool for a Short-Term Monitoring of Portal Hypertension?
title_sort spleen and liver stiffness evaluation by arfi imaging a reliable tool for a short term monitoring of portal hypertension
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7384144
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasbinzberger spleenandliverstiffnessevaluationbyarfiimagingareliabletoolforashorttermmonitoringofportalhypertension
AT markhanle spleenandliverstiffnessevaluationbyarfiimagingareliabletoolforashorttermmonitoringofportalhypertension
AT matthiaspfahler spleenandliverstiffnessevaluationbyarfiimagingareliabletoolforashorttermmonitoringofportalhypertension
AT wolfgangkratzer spleenandliverstiffnessevaluationbyarfiimagingareliabletoolforashorttermmonitoringofportalhypertension
AT thomasseufferlein spleenandliverstiffnessevaluationbyarfiimagingareliabletoolforashorttermmonitoringofportalhypertension
AT eugenzizer spleenandliverstiffnessevaluationbyarfiimagingareliabletoolforashorttermmonitoringofportalhypertension